Browse
Search
Minutes - 20020604
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Minutes - 20020604
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2017 4:33:54 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:02:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/4/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - Agenda
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 5b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 5c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 6a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 7a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8b1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8b2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8b3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8b4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8i
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8j
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8k
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8l
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8m
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8n
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8o
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8p
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 8q
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 9b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 9e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 9f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 9g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 9h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 9i
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 9j
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 9k
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002 - 9l
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002-10a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
Agenda - 06-04-2002-10b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2002\Agenda - 06-04-2002
NS ORD-2002-013 Personnel Ordinance Revision – Change Name of Personnel Advisory Board
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2002
RES-2002-039 Resolution Regarding Scrap Tire Disposal Program
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2002
S ORD-2002-015 OWASA Conservation and Demand Management Ordinance
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
conducting computer simulations to demonstrate the effectiveness of possible solutions; and 4) the new <br /> urbanism approaches are an integrated design concept where features such as the adequacy of schools, <br /> roads, mass transportation systems, watershed protection, and successful commercial enterprise viability are <br /> designed simultaneously and on a case by case basis. He noted that most of the Board of Aldermen are <br /> more concerned about getting it done rather than getting it done right. He said that the citizens are asking for <br /> the County Commissioners' involvement to protect the vision of the Northern Transition area, to ensure well <br /> planned smart growth, and to ensure the protection of existing neighborhoods. <br /> Kim Fahs, resident of the Northern Transition area for 12 years, said that she has seen some <br /> good things happen in the area and some bad. She read from the small area plan as follows: "One of the <br /> attractions of the study area is the beauty of the land itself, with its open fields, wooded streams, and rolling <br /> hills. If development leads to the destruction or alteration of these features, they cannot be reconstructed." <br /> Neighbors of the Transition Zone have joined together to form a group called HOTZ, Home Owners of the <br /> Transition Zone. She distributed a mission statement to the County Commissioners. They have also joined <br /> with the Friends of Bolin Creek. The neighbors were initially alarmed at the proposed text amendments to the <br /> village mixed use land ordinances, which Winmore developers had proposed to Carrboro. They are still <br /> concerned that a six-year community wide study plan would be prodded and tweaked for this particular <br /> developer and could potentially alter the heart and soul of the study plan. The Board of Aldermen passed <br /> almost all of the changes. She feels that democracy demands that the citizens get their chance to talk. She <br /> is asking that a public hearing be scheduled as soon as possible on these text amendments. She feels that <br /> the spirit of the joint agreement allows that each governing body have a voice on all aspects of the <br /> development process. They respectfully disagree with Craig Benedict that once it is annexed, you do not <br /> have a voice. The protection of Bolin Creek, the school over-crowding, and traffic congestion are key issues <br /> here. The proper placement of a dense mixed use neighborhood is also an issue. She made reference to <br /> the study co-authored by Professor Burke and said that he did not think that Winmore was in the best <br /> location. She urged the County Commissioners to consider public hearings on any and all future issues <br /> related to development in the Northern Transition Zone. <br /> Nancy Salmon said that her particular concern is the issue of the possible annexation of this area <br /> before the rezoning and development application is considered. She agrees that village mixed use <br /> developments should ultimately be annexed to Carrboro, but if the annexation occurs first there are really <br /> serious consequences. If annexation occurs first, it would be possible for the developer to come in with a <br /> proposal with buffers significantly less than those required for the Northern Transition area. She asked that <br /> the County Commissioners use whatever power they have to have the developers abide by any buffers that <br /> are outlined specifically in the land use ordinances for Bolin Creek. <br /> Elizabeth Pungello read a prepared statement. She is a homeowner in the Northern Transition <br /> Zone. In summary she said that the debate about Winmore was not about affordable housing. This <br /> community is pro affordable housing. She said that the community supported the Rogers Road <br /> neighborhood when it was proposed. This is a true affordable housing community. They are also pro <br /> environment. She quoted the Winmore developers as follows: "The ultimate goal of sustainable <br /> development is to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to <br /> meet their own needs." In order to do this, we must protect the areas that clean our air (trees) and provide <br /> our water (creeks). This is why she is against Winmore in its proposed location. She agrees with many of <br /> the green building ideas that the developers have proposed. She wants Winmore to be in a place that makes <br /> sense, not in a sensitive environmental area. The issue is not that they do not want this near their <br /> neighborhood, but that this particular land needs to be preserved. <br /> Betsy Pedersen, a member of the HOTZ steering committee, said that she speaks for her <br /> husband and several neighbors who were unable to attend. She said that they are opposed to the Winmore <br /> development on the proposed site. They do not want the Bolin Creek flood plain, natural area, and wildlife <br /> disturbed. The students at Smith Middle School use Bolin Creek for ecological studies. Ten of the students <br /> addressed the Carrboro Board of Aldermen two weeks ago with their concerns about the well being of the <br /> creek. The students circulated petitions in support of preservation of the creek area and collected over 370 <br /> signatures of registered voters. The HOTZ also asks that the County Commissioners exercise their elected <br /> powers, caution, and wise deliberation before allowing this development to move forward. <br /> Brian Boyce talked about the power of the County Commissioners. The area where the <br /> developers want to put this development is now forestland. Personally, he feels Winmore is a disaster in the <br /> making. It is clear to him that absence guidance from the County Commissioners, Winmore is a done deal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.