Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-31-2012 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 01-31-2012 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 01-31-2012 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2015 10:10:10 AM
Creation date
1/27/2012 12:24:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/31/2012
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-31-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT C 11 <br /> ' Excerpt from the November 10, 2011 Approved BOCC Meeting Minutes <br /> 1. Recoqnitions <br /> The Board does not currently have a standing policy or process (outside of the petitions <br /> process)for requests from Commissioners as it relates to recognizing an individual, group or <br /> corporate entity's accomplishments at a BOCC Regular meeting. <br /> Decision Points: <br /> - Does the Board want to adopt a formalized policy/process as it relates to recognition <br /> requests? <br /> - If so, what criteria/timeframe would the Board like to see as it relates to these types <br /> of recognitions? <br /> Chair Pelissier said that there was not a consensus on this item from the June 16�' <br /> meeting yet. . <br /> Commissioner Hemminger asked how it is done now. <br /> Chair Pelissier said that various departments will submit the recognitions and other <br /> times outside entities will ask the Board to recognize a person, event, theme, etc. This could <br /> become a problem if some are recognized and not others. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz said that he does not want a blanket prohibition on recognitions, <br /> but there needs to be some parameters for the Chair and Vice-Chair to decide upon. <br /> Chair Pelissier said that Commissioner Hemminger brought up those recognitions that <br /> are County-related to be a priority. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said.that both points are well made and they need to have a way <br /> to differentiate between events such as anniversaries for churches for 100 years old, or people <br /> that have done things in the community. There should be some criteria but not so exclusive. <br /> Frank Clifton said that sometimes the County may want to recognize homegrown firms <br /> that have made a significant impact on the County. This should be considered. <br /> The Board asked the Clerk to categorize the list of resolutions and proclamations that <br /> were requested by Commissioner Jacobs at the June 16"' meeting and send to all Board <br /> members to review. This item will be tabled for now and brought back to a future work session. <br /> Until the work session, the leadership will decide who is to be recognized, as part of the agenda <br /> process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.