Minutes - 20020516 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

benefits. And then we have a very, very long-range study we are doing with Raleigh, Cary and Granville County, looking at Kerr Lake as a possible future water supply. If you can imagine what the inter-basin transfer issues were with Jordan Lake and multiply that by a factor of about 10 or 100, I'm not sure which it would be, that's not going to be a simple task to accomplish. Virginia Beach worked on it far about 20 years, I think, before they finally accomplished theirs. It won't come without a lot of work. One of our mast pressing concerns is that I don't want to repeat last year. I hope we're not going to repeat last year, but we're certainly not planning any more work on Little River Lake, so we're not going to be pulling the lake down for anymore maintenance. Because they are not full yet, we are concerned about the coming year. This is a shot I threw in for your benefit of what Little River looked like on January 9, 2002. This is the very upper end of it near 501 bridge. It looks pretty bad at that point. Our mast pressing concerns really deal with the feasibility of the Teer Quarry and the permitting and construction of that. We included that in our Jordan Lake allocation request, and that was considered by the State. And I think they assumed we would be able to accomplish that. So that's part of the reason why we didn't get but 10 million gallons when we requested 20. So it's pretty important to us to have the combination of Teer Quarry and Jordan Lake. So we have a feasibility study underway on that, and we just don't have any permits yet. So we still have to work on that part. Assuming we can get all the necessary permits, we could develop that as a water supply. And then Jordan Lake allocation and how best to accomplish that, we've had some discussions with Chatham County as a possible partner in developing Jordan Lake. And we've had some discussions about partnering with OWASA and Chatham County on the development of Jordan Lake. We could do some interim things, possibly, with Chatham and with Cary to initially get some of the water from Jordan Lake through a pass through their system. So there are some short-term things that we could do. Lang term, we're probably talking about another water supply intake and water treatment facility on Jordan Lake to meet our long-term needs there. And then, of course, the feasibility of upper flat and Kerr Lake alternatives. Whether those are possible or not, we don't know. So that's basically the water supply situation in Durham. I'd be glad to answer any questions that anybody might have at this point. I forgot to mention we are interconnected with Hillsborough, OWASA, Cary, and Orange Alamance through Hillsborough. And we have contracts with Orange Alamance, Hillsborough, Cary, Morrisville, and Chatham County. We also have a direct connect with Chatham County. We are working on a contract and interconnection with Raleigh. We don't have that yet, but we're talking about it. We also have discussions underway with Granville County on a possible interconnect with them. So pretty soon we'll be interconnected with everybody an all sides. Ed Harrison: He asked about the slide before the lake level graphs. Is there a relationship in terms of sums between the reuse column and the projected demands of conservation, and can you talk about each of those, why the amounts are about where you think they are? Terry Roland: Well, I can't vouch for the math. That's right out of our Jordan application. Well, it's pretty obvious they don't add up, but I can't explain why they don't except for rounding possibly. That's the only explanation I have there. That was one of the requirements that as we looked at our projected needs, we did have to look at the potential for conservation and reuse, and we're assuming a six percent reduction in the total demand due to conservation. You have to keep in mind, we've had a pretty strong conservation program underway in Durham for quite a long time now, and so given the magnitude of these numbers and the fact that the State has enacted low-flow toilets and shower heads and a lot of the other things that were sort of the low hanging fruit in the past for conservation, we think that even six percent is pretty optimistic in terms of what we might be able to achieve. But we hope to be able to achieve those levels. The reuse is really a function of our ability to capitalize and build that system. The biggest problem with the reuse system is building the distribution system that it takes to get that water to the customers. Ed Harrison: Is it programmed yet? Terry Roland: It is not programmed in our CIP right now. We've sort of been waiting an some big industry to come along that needed the water and they would help us with the capital side of that. So we haven't programmed that. Given the current budget situation, we are not likely to program it until things get better. Don Cox: Terry, your scenario of activating the Teer Quarry -what are your plans for filling that? Terry Roland: Well, we have three potentials there. Because of its location, Teer Quarry is adjacent to our raw water line that comes from Lake Mickey and Little River. It's interconnected to both. So, potentially we could take water, and it's also adjacent to our raw water intake, I forgot to mention that. We do have emergency raw water intake on the Eno River that we can take up to five million gallons a day from the Eno as long as the flow is above 30 CFS from March through June and 10 CFS the rest of the year. We're