Orange County NC Website
Chair Jacobs: Thank you, and we have had a similar conversation with Alamance County <br />Commissioners as we've had with all the other entities here and we hope to be working with them on that <br />issue along with the issue of our disputed boundary with Alamance County in the near future. <br />At this time, I'll ask Don Cax, who introduced himself and his dual roles in Orange County, to give <br />us a presentation on the groundwater perspective, and then we'll take our break. When we come back, Pat <br />Davis from Triangle J will give us a regional overview, and then Dr. Moreau will moderate our discussion. <br />3. ORANGE COUNTY GROUNDWATER PERSPECTIVE -_ Don Cox <br />With about 40°~ of our population depending on groundwater, the County Commissioners recognized <br />that our comprehensive land use plan should address the protection of groundwater. In the fall of 1991, the <br />County Engineer, Paul Thames, called me to ask me to participate and chair a new water resources <br />committee. At the moment I was an the phone with him, I was watching awell-drilling rig renovating an <br />improperly constructed well at my house. So I bought into this groundwater resources program pretty heavily <br />then. We submitted the committee's final report last year. The considerations of the recommendations of our <br />report for inclusion in the County land use plan are just now beginning. This study was a cooperative effort <br />with the U. S. Geological Survey. They cost shared 5d°~ with us and there were three main topics -the <br />threats to groundwater, quantity of groundwater, and the quality of our groundwater resources. Ta determine <br />the present and future threats to groundwater, the majority of the existing wells in the County were located by <br />GPS systems, and all new wells that are being constructed are being located at that time, and we're updating <br />our database and records whenever that happens. That will let us know where the wells are in the County. <br />And all identified underground storage tanks, landfills, and any other identifiable threat locations are also in <br />that database and will be kept up to date. So if there is a spill of same kind, we'll know which location, we'll <br />know how many wells and what their proximity are to it, and hopefully that database will serve us well in the <br />future. We also emphasize and do continue to emphasize the importance of following the State guidelines <br />and sealing, or filling, abandoned ar unused wells to avoid their becoming a conduit for groundwater <br />contamination. This needs to be an ongoing effort and some landowners may need financial assistance to <br />comply. <br />With regard to the quantity of groundwater, a study done by using stream gauge measurements to <br />determine stream base flaws of groundwater to surface streams, sails maps, geologic structures, typography, <br />and land use, or estimates of groundwater yields and the recharge area requirements were made for all sub- <br />basins in the County. From this, the average groundwater yields and recharge areas needed can be <br />estimated. The groundwater quality study sampled numerous wells across the County. These wells were <br />located in all major hydro-geologic formations in every river basin. They were sampled for a wide range of <br />naturally occurring minerals, manmade chemicals, petroleum residues, and radon gas. As expected, a lot of <br />the wells showed high iron and manganese and radon in the known granite structures. We found very little <br />fertilizer, pesticides, and petro-chemical residues in the sample. So at this point in time, as of two or three <br />years ago, all of the sampling showed excellent water quality. But folks who have higher iron know they have <br />to deal with that. <br />A question: Why should the public water service suppliers be concerned about groundwater issues? <br />Sustainable groundwater resources maintain the base flows to surface streams, which support reservoir <br />levels and maintain stream water quality and ecology. Perhaps the biggest reason is to avoid the emergency <br />need to extend public water supplies to areas which have become non-sustaining in groundwater availability <br />ar quality. What can you do to help Orange County and its groundwater sustainability efforts? Your support <br />for informing the public about the importance of lot sizes and restrictions which preserve the groundwater <br />resource. These may need to include well head protection, impervious surface limits, undisturbed recharge <br />area preservation, well replacement locations, septic system drain fields, and reserve drain field areas. <br />Those are some of the issues. It's not going to be a popular thing to discuss about raising minimum <br />lot sizes in certain sub-basins in the County. But when you consider the cost of a little bit of additional land <br />versus 10 or 15 years dawn the road of having no water at your house, that's an interesting tradeoff. <br />Chair Jacobs: One of Orange Alamance's practices is to dig large wells. Do we have any <br />understanding of the relationship between a utility digging a large well and the effect an neighboring smaller <br />wells that provide service for individual lots? <br />Don Cox: I'm not technically able to answer that. Obviously wells close by would be impacted with <br />large draw downs. I understand that one of their high yielding wells is right on the banks of McGowan Creek <br />