Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-24-2012 - 8e
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2012
>
Agenda - 01-24-2012 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 01-24-2012 - 8e
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/11/2015 3:05:24 PM
Creation date
1/23/2012 8:34:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/24/2012
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8e
Document Relationships
Minutes 01-24-2012
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/FINANCIAL <br />Both the Durham and Wake County transit plans propose a commuter rail <br />component that would be scheduled to be operational in the mid-term (2018) <br />versus the longer term (2025) for potential LRT. Could Orange County be <br />studied and monies estimated for Commuter Rail to Hillsborough as part of the <br />longer term? Paul Morris, NC Deputy Secretary for Transit spoke recently of <br />state interest in upgrading commuter lines and freight lines to assist in economic <br />development, which would be the case in the Efland-Buckhorn economic <br />development zones west of Hillsborough. <br />2. Could a circulator route be added to the bus service element within the Chapel <br />Hill and Carrboro area to provide better access to shopping opportunities within <br />Orange County for Orange County residents? Bolstered sales revenues can be <br />reinvested within Orange County. <br />STAFF POST NOTE <br />Although it is difficult to summarize the technical and philosophical questions from the <br />BOCC related to the AA and LPA and how it comports to the unique challenges of <br />multiple travel patterns and corridors and status of economic development opportunities <br />in Orange County, staff has made a reasonable compilation. In summary, they asked <br />how can our regional fixed route transit investment of over $80 million, not including the <br />$5 million annual investment in bus service, be spent to serve the needs of Orange <br />County residents and businesses in a manner that will create return benefits of land <br />use, environment and economic development that matches the vision of Orange County <br />residents (i.e. matching the corridor and technology to the appropriate scale of the <br />Durham-Orange corridor). <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.