Browse
Search
Minutes - 20020513
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Minutes - 20020513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 4:49:47 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 2:01:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/13/2002
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
an both committees. It is important that there be good communication so that everyone knows what is <br />happening. <br />Commissioner Brown noted that if we are trying to colocate active athletic facilities that both schools <br />and the public can use, why would we separate this at the planning level. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that there is a preconcept plan and this is a very large group. The <br />educational work group may need a longer time period to do their work. <br />After a brief discussion, the Board decided to change the language so that the Work Group may <br />instead of vvrll divide into two subcommittees. <br />Commissioner Carey made reference to the timeline and said that the Board of Commissioners is <br />supposed to review and approve the master plan in March. He feels it may take longer for review by the <br />Board and suggested adding at least one or two months to allow time for the Board of County Commissioners <br />to consider this plan. It was decided that this will be changed in the timeline. <br />There was a consensus of the Board to request that staff provide a list of possibilities for coloration <br />before the end of the budget year. <br />2. DRAFT COUNTY PARK FACILITY PLANNING fPFP) PROCESS <br />David Stancil presented information on a draft process and status report for park projects in the <br />Manager's recommended CIP. He said that staff has worked, through the CIP process, to identify the <br />potential timetable for the parks and open space projects approved as part of the 2001 bond. The Park <br />Facility Planning document in the agenda would serve to address park projects within the County's <br />jurisdiction that are not joint Town/County projects. It was provided as a starting point for Board discussion <br />on the status and phasing of County parks projects. The agenda also provided a summary sheet on the <br />status of planning and design work for each project. <br />The Basic Operating Principles ensures that each project will receive equal footing in terms of initial <br />appropriation and planning and design potential. Regarding the summary sheet for each project, David <br />Stancil said that information is provided about each park project, the resources needed to accomplish the <br />task, the current status of the project, the other partners or "players" in the project, and a potential timeline of <br />activities if each project was started an July 1, 2002. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that he feels this is a wonderful way to track projects, who is involved <br />and accountability. <br />Chair Jacobs asked if this summary is meant to be an inclusive list of all the projects. David Stancil <br />said that this list is for only tier 2 and tier 3 projects. Chair Jacobs asked about Blackwood Farm and Seven <br />Mile Creek and said that he would like to see all the projects listed whether they have money for development <br />or nat. David Stancil said that he has a spreadsheet which tracks all the projects which he will provide to the <br />Board. <br />Commissioner Gordon suggested adding tier 5 projects for which money is not identified. <br />John Link asked if the County Manager should serve on the construction team and David Stancil said <br />that he will include him in the composition. <br />Commissioner Brown asked if there is any place where people working on these plans could use <br />ideas about incorporating solar lighting, etc. Do we have a list of standards that we would require be included <br />in the plans. David Stancil said that it would be a case-by-case basis where the County Commissioners can <br />say if they feel that the project would be suitable for solar. Also, there could be guiding principles that would <br />apply to all projects. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.