Minutes - 20020502 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

pointing out, the chances of somebody just going down the road and attacking the casks is slimmer since security would come and ask them to stop doing it. Are these vulnerabilities real or am I just up here Chicken Little, scare mongering? I think the indications that suggest that they might be real is that nuclear power plants cannot go out and get private liability insurance, because no insurance company would provide insurance for the level of damage that could come from the radiation released from a nuclear power plant. The federal government had to provide federal liability protection for Shearon Harris and all the other plants because the damage is so great. Whether that damage is accidental or by intent, it does not really matter. The vulnerability is there, and terrorists could exploit that vulnerability if we are not careful. In addition, if you look at nuclear power plants, they are ringed by an emergency planning zone. The reason for that is because the radiation could be released and it was thought prudent to provide some protection for people living nearby, a ten-mile zone was thought to be the prudent range, and there have been some discussions about whether that is enough or not. And lastly, the spent fuel that exists at Shearon Harris and the other plants is there because the federal government has not yet opened up a permanent repository for the spent fuel. The challenge facing the Department of Energy is to find a place where these can be safely isolated from the environment for 10,000 years into the future. It is a threat in the reactor, it is a threat for 10,000 years once you dispose of it; obviously, between those two places it is also a hazard. The further answer of whether these vulnerabilities are real is in October of 2000 the NRC released a report about the risk of spent fuel damage. Basically, among other conclusions, they said that if radiation were to be released from this spent fuel, roughly there would be over 2,300 cancer deaths to the people living within 100 miles, and there would be 26,800 cancer deaths out to 500 miles from the radiation released. So assume 100 per square mile population density. Ninety-seven percent of these fatalities would be caused by Cesium 137, which has a 30-year half-life. This stuff is not going away anytime soon. Where would the radiation go if it were to be released from Shearon Harris? Basically it would circle the globe. After the Chernobyl accident in 1986, our detectors at our plant saw the radioactive cloud as it went by. It was not enough to cause damage to people in this country, but it did cause damage to people living closer to the plant. How close? The picture closest to me is from the Chernobyl plant in 1996, ten years after the accident. This is the plant itself. This area up here is 120 miles away approximately, and it is still so heavily contaminated that people cannot go into it ten years later. That zone is still out there today. Most of the contamination is from Cesium 137. Approximately three million curies of Cesium 137 were released in this accident. There is about 20 times that much in the Shearon Harris spent fuel pools. One of the things we hear a lot but disagree with every time we hear it is that nuclear power plants are well protected, they are hardened targets, and smart terrorists would go down the street and attack softer targets. I am not a terrorist, I have never been a member of a terrorist group, and I do not know what terrorists think. But to look at what they have done in the past, they do not have a history of attacking soft targets. A few years ago they attacked U. S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. They could have attacked U. S. corporate facilities and offices in those two countries that were not protected by U. S. Marines, but instead they chose the harder target and were successful. Less than two years ago they bombed the USS Cole at Port Newman. They went by unarmed merchant ships in the harbor to attack an armed U. S. ship. And in the last year they attacked the Pentagon in Washington, DC. There were several other buildings in DC that were unarmed. The fact that it was one of the most secure facilities in DC apparently did not dissuade the terrorists. So I do not think that we need to trust our future on the fact that the terrorists may not choose to attack Shearon Harris, I think we need to make sure that Shearon Harris is protected to the extent possible so that terrorists will not be successful and not rely on them not attacking it to ensure our futures. Thank you.