Minutes - 20020502 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

been adjusted for differences in age and sex in the population. And we have also adjusted these rates for the pre-accident cancer rates. So the rates that are shown in the bar graph at the bottom of this map are adjusted for the pre-accident cancer rates. So these are the lung cancer rates that are occurring after the accident adjusted for the pre-accident rates. And what I want you to notice is that there is an upward increase in the rates for each dose group, in terms of the increased intensity of the plumes that were estimated from the accident, the accident plumes. And there is about a four to five-fold excess of lung cancer in the highest dose group compared to the lowest dose group. The lowest exposed area being in the northeasterly direction. This is not the type of accident that would occur with a fuel pool fire, such as the kinds of scenarios that are of most concern here tonight, because there are different types of radiation which are released in a reactor accident than in a fuel pool accident. You heard earlier that Cesium 137 with a half-life of 30 years would be most important in a fuel pool accident. In this accident, the most important releases were radioactive gases, not particles — like xenon and krypton. We felt that these lung cancer incidents rates were particularly of interest because the lungs are exposed to the air we breathe. I also wanted to note that this is an accident that is considered by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to have been an insignificant one. And if you consult the Nuclear Regulatory Commission you will find that no one was hurt at this accident. We analyzed these data, they were published in a peer review journal, and we have not in the five years now since the publication of these findings, we have not heard anything from anyone who has found any mistakes with our analysis or anything like that. I wanted to present this to you just as an example of one accident that did occur in the United States. And this accident was not a result - at least it is not thought to have been the result - of any kind of a terrorist act. One of the arguments that I have heard many times is that, "The probability of an accident is very, very low, so that is why we should not be concerned about the environmental contamination or the potential health effects from a fuel pool fire or from a nuclear meltdown because the probability of the accident is very low." But I would just note that the technologies that we are dealing with are extremely complex. We, in recent years, certainly have experienced accidents that had very low probability. The probability of the space shuttle blowing up on launch was very low. The probability of an accident such as what occurred at Bhopal in India was very low. The probability of a nuclear meltdown like at Three Mile Island is very low. But in central North Carolina, we heard a few minutes ago that the amount of Cesium 137 in the fuel pools that are located at the Shearon Harris plant is greater than what was released in the Chernobyl accident. And there are large areas around Chernobyl that are no longer habitable. These are the kinds of issues that I think that we should at least discuss. And I really want to thank the Commissioners and NCWARN for having this meeting, in part because I think it is so important that the issues be debated. My real concern is that the discussion thus far has primarily been taking place among the experts and has not involved the public. I think that there are a lot of basic issues. And I thank all of you for coming out tonight because I think this kind of involvement is really key to protecting ourselves and our communities. Thank you (applause). e. Water Safety Issues —Alan Rimer I'm Alan Rimer with the Orange Water and Sewer Authority representing the Board of Directors and I am drinking Orange Water and Sewer Authority water. We are here tonight and I'm here tonight representing the Orange Water and Sewer Authority; not from the perspective of the experts that you have heard with respect to what is actually going on at Shearon Harris or what might go on at Shearon Harris, but what the environmental fallout from what might go on there under a number of different scenarios could do to impact the region as a whole - all of the water supplies in the region, not just the Orange Water and Sewer Authority. For those of you who are not familiar with our authority, we serve about 70,000 people in