Browse
Search
Minutes 10-04-2011
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Minutes 10-04-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2015 9:46:54 AM
Creation date
1/3/2012 9:09:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/4/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-04-2011
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 4a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 4b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 5a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 5c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 5d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 5e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 5f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 5g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 5h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 5i
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 5j
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 5k
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 5l
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 5m
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 7b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 8a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 10-04-2011
ORD-2011-031 Application for NC Education Lottery Proceeds for Schools
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2011
ORD-2011-032 Purchase of Three Ambulances and Approval of Budget Amendment #2-C
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-084 Resolution approving Motor Vehicle Property Tax Release/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-085 Resolution approving Property Tax Release/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-086 Resolution approving Applications for Property Tax Exemption/Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-087 Resolution Regarding Bond Order Authorizing General Obligation Refunding Bonds in the Maximum Amount of $47,000,000 to Refund Public Improvements Bonds Issued in 2004 and 2005
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Frank Clifton made reference to Attachment 4 and said that the charts give a physical <br /> street address and connection costs. This attachment only includes costs for water and not <br /> sewer. <br /> Michael Talbert pointed out the homes on a map that are hooked onto the water <br /> system. <br /> Commissioner Hemminger said that part of her concern is that if this is done out of <br /> County funding by itself in Chapel Hill's and Carrboro's jurisdictions, she feels strongly that this <br /> is a landfill issue coordinated for hooking up water. It is something that everybody has paid <br /> into. She does not want to set a precedent of coming into jurisdictions and doing this. <br /> Frank Clifton said that the County already spent $600,000 out of the Landfill Fund. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs made reference to page 66 and asked who prepared these <br /> options, with advantages and disadvantages. <br /> Solid Waste Director Gayle Wilsons said that it was prepared by the consultant. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that this is inappropriate to count public involvement as a <br /> disadvantage to any kind of process. This is repeated in this document. He wants to be clear <br /> that public involvement is an advantage and not a disadvantage. He wants people to be able <br /> to feel that the participation is valued. <br /> Commissioner Foushee pointed out that this comment has been made before when this <br /> document first came out. The Board asked that these comments not be included in any other <br /> of the documents related to processes. <br /> Frank Clifton said that the statements are appropriate, but he thinks that the consultant <br /> meant that there is a public hearing process that is required for one step versus another one. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs asked when the Ieachate liner was breached, which he heard <br /> from the public comments. Gayle Wilson said that he is not aware of that happening. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that when water was provided to the Rogers Road <br /> neighborhood, there were extended conversations about whether or not there was a causal <br /> relationship between Ieachate from the landfill and water quality in the neighborhood. Staff <br /> said at that time that the monitoring well showed that there was no contamination. Gayle <br /> Wilson said that this is correct. Commissioner Jacobs asked if that was still the case. Gayle <br /> Wilson said that this is still the case based on the routine and ongoing monitoring program. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said that there is a significant difference between how the <br /> County regards Rogers Road water and sewer and how it regards Fox Meadow and other <br /> subdivisions and what the obligation is as a unit of government, as the landfill may or may not <br /> relate to the need for water and sewer. He said that a lot of these issues require the County to <br /> have a meeting with the other governments. He suggested having a government assembly <br /> instead of an Assembly of Governments so that people know it is something new. He <br /> suggested that it be reiterated that the Greene Tract would be maintained as open space. <br /> Orange County has committed to this. Also, what will be spent from the General Fund versus <br /> the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund should be discussed with the towns. He also wants to talk <br /> about joint approaches to waste disposal. He also thinks that there should be a discussion <br /> about levels of contamination because people are convinced that the landfill has contaminated <br /> the water. This needs to be addressed for all of the governmental officials to hear. <br /> Commissioner Foushee agreed with Commissioner Jacobs. She said that she would <br /> like to separate the remediation process from the landfill closing and everything else for just a <br /> moment. She said that she has been on this Board for about seven years and the Board <br /> committed itself to direct staff to come up with a plan for remediation. She said that the one <br /> thing that the County Commissioners have always known is that this process will be expensive. <br /> The residents of Rogers Road have been told for 40 years that it will cost a lot of money to do <br /> this. The County has to be careful how this is done. She said that knowing that it is going to <br /> be expensive does not preclude the County from moving forward. She thinks that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.