Browse
Search
Minutes - 20020225
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Minutes - 20020225
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 5:00:05 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:59:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/25/2002
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
NS ORD-2002-006 An Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance Article 9 Signs
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
is permitted by the code is adequate representation for the information needed to be conveyed to the <br />public. The administration recommends that the proposed amendment be referred to the Planning Board <br />for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of County Commissioners no sooner than May 21, <br />2oa2. <br />Public Comment <br />Pierre Morin, the petitioner, said that he was one of four builders in Churton Grove <br />subdivision. He said that it was a little difficult to compete without showing new homebuyers the <br />differences in each of their products. He said that a 2'x2' sign was not sufficient because most <br />homebuyers would see the first house and assume that it was the only builder in the subdivision. He <br />said that 16 square feet might be larger, but it is not as large as the Parade of Homes signs, which are <br />36'x36'. He said that he was just showing to new homebuyers their product as compared to other <br />builders' products. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to <br />refer the proposed amendment to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board <br />of County Commissioners no sooner than May 21, 2002. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />2. Orange County Hazard Mitigation Plan <br />Craig Benedict said that this item is in response to new legislation that was put into effect <br />in June 2001, also known as Senate Bill 300. It was an act to amend the laws regarding emergency <br />management as recognized by the legislation because of some of the recent disasters in North Carolina <br />such as flooding. In response to the legislative act, there was a strong suggestion that any local <br />government that would like to be in line far assistance in case of future natural disasters should put <br />together a hazard mitigation plan. If local governments are interested in assistance funds, it is a <br />requirement that they adopt a plan prior to August of this year. The purpose of this item is to explain <br />what a hazard mitigation plan includes. There was a PowerPoint presentation. <br />Orange County worked with Greensboro and the Emergency Management Division of <br />North Carolina to develop this plan. The goal is to make residences and businesses less vulnerable to <br />impacts and have a coordinated approach through discussion between local governments. Hurricanes, <br />tornadoes, lightning, and snowstorms are some of the disasters that have hit North Carolina in the past <br />few years. Another part of the mitigation strategy is to identify the junkyards and automobile <br />establishments that are in the way of flooding because oil and other liquids from the cars can get caught <br />up in the flooding and cause further damage downstream. Part of the requirement in the Senate bill is <br />that the plan should be very strong in the Planning aspect. Emergency Management is an up front <br />participant, but the state wanted the focus to be on planning to prevent structures from going into the <br />floodplain or being placed in hazardous areas. EMS typically comes in the reactive stage so the state <br />wants planning to be proactive to guide this in the areas of building, planning and erosion control. There <br />has been some development along floodplains in the past, and this needs to be identified. This draft <br />plan will be transmitted to the state for comment. The comments will came back and the final plan can <br />be submitted. Part of the requirement of the plan is to do training with the community. <br />Commissioner Brown asked if there were any counties in the east that were not <br />participating. Craig Benedict said that about 90°~ of the counties in the east were participating. There <br />are a few counties in the coastal areas that have not put it together. Some communities do not have the <br />ability, between their existing departments or staff, to put it together. <br />The proposed action for this meeting is that we continue getting input from the local <br />governments in preparing the plan and bring back a transmittal version of the hazard mitigation plan to <br />the County Commissioners prior to June 1St. The state will send back their comments in order for the <br />County to send the plan back to the state by August 1St. There is no financial impact at this time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.