Agenda - 12-08-2011 - Attachment 2

Browse Search

generally comfortable as a group to let Durham County know that Orange County is interested in a regional plan. Commissioner McKee said that a regional plan is not a regional plan unless the largest player is part of it. The largest player -Wake County -has decided to take .itself out of the equation. Orange County is depending on two assumptions -that the federal government and the state are going to come to the table with 75% of the money to finance this light rail: He would like to have this in two parts: a bus plan and a light rail. He is not supportive of a light rail at this point. Commissioner Hemminger said that this has been the most informational session. She said that she has to be realistic and she is interested in the bus component of this plan, but she is not ready to move this on the ballot in the fall. She still has not heard about the license tag fee arid she would like a timetable. Chair Pelissier said that she is hearing that there are some who are uncomfortable with a financial plan for light rail because of the uncertainties of the state and federal funding. She said that if there is no plan for light rail, even though it makes an assumption, then there will be no light rail. Plan B would be a bus system only, if there are no monies from the federal and state governments. She said that the County Commissioners want more details. She said that there is no outline in the plan what happens with the obligations of the %2-cent sales tax. For example, the %rcent sales tax cannot be used for supplanting existing services, but only for new services. There are a lot of things that have been discussed and it needs to all be in one place and one document. All of the regional bus routes, including which ones are fare free, should be in writing. Commissioner Yuhasz said that they all see the value in participating in a regional transportation plan. However, with the financial plan, he is not prepared to make a decision on that during this budget season. He said that all of this information should be brought to the Board over the break so that the County Commissioners can make a decision when they return in the fall. He said that he does not want to place the %rcent transit tax on the ballot in the fall. A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Hemminger to not proceed with a November 2011 referendum on the %2-cent sales tax and set a date later this year for discussion of the new timetable and get further information related to Orange County components of the local and regional transit plans, and indicate to Durham, Carrboro, Chapel Hill, UNC, and the public our continued interest in pursuing participation and in enhanced regional public transportation system. VOTE: UNANIMOUS Commissioner Gordon asked about June 21St and Chair Pelissier said that the motion did not specify when to receive more information. Chair Pelissier asked if the Board wanted to look at the interlocal agreement. Commissioner Foushee said to leave this document until later. David King thanked the County Commissioners for their time and they have taken a shot at putting information in writing for a plan. He said that he would provide all of this information to the County Commissioners.. Commissioner Foushee asked to have the draft interlocal agreement available for the County Commissioners to see. Craig Benedict said that the draft is in the packet, but it is edited on a daily basis by multiple parties. The additional information can come to the Board on June 21St Frank Clifton said that he understands what the Board is asking for, -but there are limitations of staff and there are two more budget meetings between now and June 21St 16