Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 7a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

DRAFT 353 354 VOTE: Unanimous 355 356 Michael Harvey: The next item begins on page 41, Section 3.8.4 Conditional Districts -Where Permitted. You will note that staff 357 has made an affirmative finding that the applicant has complied with the requirements of this section of the UDO and that we 35$ have provided you with the elements within the record justifying this finding. 359 360 Brian Crawford: Have the planning board reviewed Section-3.8.4 and the recommended findings by the staff? Are there any 361 objections? Seeing there are none, I will entertain a motion. 3 62 363 MOTI~w made by Alan Campbell that the Planning Board adopt as Findings of_Fact all the findings presented by the planning 364 staff as described on page 41 of our abstract concerning the applicant's compliance with Section 3.8.4 UDO based on the 365- evidence supplied within Attachment 3. Seconded by Buddy Hartley. 366 367 VOTE: Unanimous 368 369 Michael Harvey: On pages 42 through 44, we have made recommendations with respect to the applicants compliance with 370 Sections 7.2 and 2.7.3, provisions governing the submittal requirements of a Class A Special Use Permit Application. 371 372 Mark Marcoplos: What. is the meaning of vesting. 373 374 Michael Harvey: Vesting in the North Carolina General Statues is where an applicant ask the governing _body to vest the site 375 .plan_for at least a minimum of two years so that site plan governs the entire development of the project. There is no-need to vest 376 this site plan. The applicant anticipates they will begin development of the infrastructure necessary for construction in the 3 77 necessary time frame. 378 3 79 Mark Marcop{os: So to vest is just to say we want this to apply .... 380 381 Michael Harvey: And pay an additional fee if they need to. The only clarifying point is the fact that they have agreed to stagger 3 $2 and phase in the development of the homes consistent with the Orange County School Board or school system. 383 384 Rachel Hawkins: On page 44, 2.7.3 (B) (10), it states the narrative indicates that the school will commence operations as soon 385 as the permit is approved. 386 3 $7 Michael Harvey: My apologies that is my oversight. 3$8 389 Rachel Hawkins: What school? 390 391 Michael Harvey: The finding should read that the narrative provides the necessary phase schedule to address the school's 39-2 concerns. 393 394 Larry Wright: When we act, we will be acting on this amendment to this. 395 396 Michael Harvey: Correct. The motion should be to find staffs approval for the evidence submitted- on pages 42-44 with. the 397 amended 2.7.3 (B) (10) as stated by the staff, 398 399 MonoN made by Larry Wright on Sections 2.2 and 2.7.3 that we find it compliant with staffs recommendation with the exception 440 of 2.7.3 (B) (10) and this would be the amendment presented here in 2.7.3. 10 as submitted by Mr. Harvey. Seconded Pete 401 Hallenbeck. 402 403 VOTE: Unanimous 404 405 Michael Harvey: On page 45, we include recommended findings with respect to the applicant's compliance with Section 2,7,5, 406 the notification requirements associated with the processing of a Class A Special Notification Requirements. 407 408 MOTION made by Pete Hallenbeck to find that the applicant had complied with the requirements of Section 2.7.5 on page 45 in 409 compliance as per staffs recommendation and that the Board adopted the staffs findings. Seconded Andrea Rohrbacher. 410 VorE: Unanimous 411 43 7