Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 10-04-2011
>
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2011 2:49:17 PM
Creation date
11/28/2011 2:48:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/4/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 10-04-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
S Planning - Habitat for Humanity OC, NC Inc. - Tinnin Woods Project - Special Use Permit
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
40 <br />DRAFT <br />177 Michael Harvey: I won't answer for Ms. Whiffed. I think she was under the impression there would be hydrants installed down <br />178 Tinnin Road. This was never a requiremen# of the planning board or the fire marshal: I will remind the board that in Attachment <br />179 2, there is a correspondence from the Orange County Solid Waste dealing with the radiate of the cul-de-sac, which has not been <br />180 approved by DOT and Orange County Solid Waste. <br />181 <br />182 Brian Crawford: Is anybody aware of this change in the school drop-off? <br />183 <br />184 Michael Harvey: This is the first I have heard of it. I will state that Dr. McFarland was provided.=the original site plan for this <br />185 proposal and upon reviewing it his only recommended condition, and it is incorporated within the application submitted as part of <br />186 the record at the May Quarterly Hearing, that development of these lots will -be phased over time to accommodate the school's <br />187 cap limita#ion so there is adequate public space for the new students. The document filed with the Orange County School <br />188 System-has never expressed= any issues about access management or traffic. <br />189 <br />190 -Mark Marcoplos: This is the first time we have heard they changed the traffic flow of the school. It sounds like they knew this <br />191 development was in the works... <br />192 <br />193 Michael -Harvey: They were provided copies of this as part of our pre-application process a month before the public hearing-and <br />194 ask to provide comments which is in your May Quarterly Public-Hearing package. <br />195 <br />196 Mark Marcoplos: By making this traffic flow change, they are acknowledging that it will work with the neighborhood? <br />197 <br />198 Michael Harvey: They knew that a 28 lot subdivision was being proposed and they -knew there would be a couple hundred <br />_l 99 additional cars traveling through this area-and their only comment was that you need to stagger or phase in the development and <br />200 they chose to change the access to the school knowing this 28 lot subdivision would be here. <br />201 <br />202 Mark Marcoplos: So they were more concerned about construction traffic? <br />203 <br />204 Michael Harvey: As well as guaranteeing sufficient seating capacity to handle the 28 single family housing which is why the <br />205 housing is being phased over time. <br />206 <br />207 Mark Marcoplos: To meet the size of the student body? <br />208 <br />209 Michael Harvey: Correct. <br />210 <br />211 Mark Marcoplos: Does anyone know if there is an opportunity to go back to the original traffic flow? <br />212 <br />Z 13 Michael Harvey: That would be a question for the school: <br />214 <br />215 Pete Hallenbeck: It is interesting that the school recently had a turning lane put in next to the school and-now they have opted to <br />216 change the drop-off and then work with DOT to get a similar turning lane. I tend to separate that from concerns about the-traffic. <br />217 I also see an opportunity for the development, county and school to work with DOT to get a turning lane there, which would make <br />218 things better. There is a turning lane going into the Ashwick Subdivision, which is just east of there. Does anyone know how <br />219 many units there are total planned for the Ashwick Subdivision versus this Tinnin Woods subdivision? It seems that is a <br />220 comparable situation. Someone made the decision to say that Ashwick needed a turning lane off of Highway 70 and I think we <br />221 need to take a similar look with this project. <br />222 <br />223 Michael Harvey: Ashwick is based on a previously approved Special Use Permit that I am not 100% comfortable answering how <br />224 many lots that are proposed or how a turn lane came into existence. <br />225 <br />226 Pete Hallenbeck: I would suggest looking at that would give people some guidance about how necessary it is to have turn lanes. <br />227 If the number of units was within 20% of the number of units in Tinnin Woods, that would tell me there really should have been a <br />228 turn lane put in and that got missed. <br />229 <br />230 The topic of hydrants, an informational matter for everyone, is the reason the blow offs values were changed on hydrants at the <br />231 end of the line is originally they were adapting smaller water lines and smaller lines so therefore the water gets changed out <br />232 more often. When you get a bigger line, there is a problem that the water can get stale at the end of that flow so you need to <br />233 have a way at the end of the line to flush the line out. That is a tradeoff when you look at the size of the water line for fire <br />234 suppression versus the water line that just size for drinking water. With regard to hydrants in general, the Efland Fire <br />235 Department has been looking in that area, Tinnin Road to add a hydrant. If you look at the hydrant spread on US 70, ideally, you <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.