Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 7a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

d. The application complied with submittal requirements (i.e. Sections 2.2 and 2.7) of the UDO, e. The application complied with the specific standards for the submission of a Conditional Use (CU) application as detailed in Section 2.9.1 of the UDO, f. The application complied with the specific standards governing the location of Conditional Districts as detailed within Section 3.8.4 of the UDO, g. The application contained sufficient information demonstrating compliance with the specific regulations governing the development of Major Subdivisions as set forth in Section(s) 5.15.6 and 7.14.6 of the UDO, h. There was sufficient evidence entered into the record by the applicant demonstrating compliance with Section 5.3.2 (B) of the UDO relating to the method and adequacy of the provision of: a. Sewage disposal facilities, b. The adequacy of police, fire, and rescue squad protection, and c. The adequacy of vehicular access to the site and traffic conditions around the site i. There was sufficient evidence and testimony within the record allowing for an affirmative finding on the general findings of fact for this project (i.e. Section 5.3.2 (A) (2)) of the UDO, and j. There was insufficient evidence or testimony within the record demonstrating that the applicant had not meet their burden of proof requiring the denial of the application. Please refer to Attachment(s) 7 and 9 of this abstract for additional information. FINANCIAL IMPACT: This request has been reviewed by various County departments who have determined that the approval or denial of the request would not create the need for additional funding for the provision of County services. RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the BOCC take the following actions: 1. Receive the Planning Board recommendation, 2. If necessary, deliberate further on the application, 3. Close the public hearing, 4. Review and approve the Resolution of Rezoning Approval contained within Attachment 7 of the abstract, 5. Review the Special Use Permit Findings of Fact Sheet contained within Attachment 9 of the abstract and affirm the findings of the Planning Board, as detailed therein, that the applicant has demonstrated compliance with: a. Specific standards for the submission of a Conditional Use (CU) application as detailed in Section 2.9.1 of the UDO, b. Specific standards for the submission of Special Use Permit applications as outlined within Section(s) 2.2 and 2.7 of the UDO, c. Standards governing the location of Conditional Districts as detailed within Section 3.8.4 of the UDO,