Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 7a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 10-04-2011
>
Agenda - 10-04-2011 - 7a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2011 2:49:17 PM
Creation date
11/28/2011 2:48:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/4/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7a
Document Relationships
Minutes 10-04-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
S Planning - Habitat for Humanity OC, NC Inc. - Tinnin Woods Project - Special Use Permit
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2010 - 2019\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />Michael Harvey: Any time you have a public road, with a NCDOT right of way and local citizens have concerns over traffic, <br />access issues or congestion, they can contact the Graham Regional Office, Mr: Chuck Edwards, who is the NDCOT designated <br />engineer and request a reassessment of traffic load and DOT may have to engage in widening, the installation of turn lanes, or <br />what you have you. I don't want to speak for Mr. Edwards but I can tell you, as we testified to in -the May hearing, that we have <br />submitted the plan to NCDOT who indicated thatthe existing road capacity could serve this project as proposed. <br />Larry Wright: If they ever had a problem, they could call the Planning Department. <br />Michael Harvey: Yes. And we could provide them the necessary contact information. <br />Chad Abbott: In our responses to the comments to our July meeting, we responded that the #raffic engineer in our office had <br />es#imated that the project would create approximately 268 trips per day based on that land use, 210_ single family homes for that <br />land use category and generate about 268 trips per day_ That is per day. <br />Brian Crawford: Mr. Harvey, Ms. Whiffed speculated there may have been changes between the public hearing and-this meeting <br />to the project plan, are you aware of those changes? <br />Michael Harvey: Yes. As you will recall from the May Quarterly Public Hearing and also discussed at the July regular planning <br />board meeting. <br />The general focus of concern was the pedestrian access areas, connectivity with both Richmond Hill and with the school, the <br />location of hydrants, with the width of the proposed cul-de-sae to address solid waste management and a DOT concern, as well <br />as the orientation and make up of these lots here with respect to ensuring additional open space to buffer, protect and identify <br />wetland as the applicant has submitted. That was a BOCC's concern with Commissioner Yuhas ask if there was a way to <br />reconfigure. There was originally four lots proposed here, it is limited to three lots and there is approximately 32 feet of additional <br />open space separating the closed developed lots from the wetland area. You will also note that there were concerns over <br />access to these lots and staff recommended a condition that there be a joint driveway coming out here. This- has been provided <br />and appear to address NCDOT, Orange County Solid Waste, and potentially Orange County school concerns over providing a <br />sufficient vehicular turn around location to allow vehicles to back up and turn around in this area. <br />The applicant has designated the pedestrian access ways as requested by the planning board and the BOCC as portions of the <br />proposed open space area rather than as just easements. There will be independent pathways dedicated as part of the open <br />space. We have the designated 10-foot lot pedestrian access here, an existing trail from Richmond Hill and an existing trail <br />connecting to the elementary school. <br />There was some additional buffer installed here as suggested by planning board members. <br />Referring to Attachment 1 in the abstract, the applicant has respond to all conditions including their willingness to extend the <br />water line from Richmond Hill, which was a requirement by staff, which was agreed to by the BOCC and planning board. <br />They have agreed that sidewalks are a good idea. The issue is who will pay for them and install. That will be a general BOCC <br />discussion, independent of this project, at their October 6 meeting. The planning board's recommendation was that the <br />sidewalks are encouraged but within NCDOT right of way and under the requirement that another entity be required to install and <br />maintain them. We have been in contact with DOT and their point is that we are not going to install or maintain sidewalks but at <br />least the condition is there. The applicant's response is a two party agreement with NCDOT to install the sidewalks. <br />The hydrants have been tightened up as required by the Orange County Fire Marshall. There was-one moved from Tinnin Road <br />from the western portion to the eastern portion as required by Mr. Sykes. <br />Chad Abbott: We have also added one at the end of Tinnin Road per OAWS and we have added another one at the end of <br />School House. <br />Larry Wright: What is being added? <br />Michael Harvey: There is a new hydrant at the end of School House. <br />Larry Wright: These are the ones Ms. Whitted was addressing? <br />39 <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.