Orange County NC Website
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />23- <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />54 <br />55 <br />56 <br />57 <br />58 <br />59 <br />DRAF'T' <br />MINUTES <br />ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br />SEPTEMBER 7,2011 <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />ATTACHMENT 4 ~ <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: Brian Crawford (Chair); Eno Township Representative; Larry Wright (~Ce-Chair), At-Large, Cedar Grove <br />Township; Alan Campbell, Cedar Grove Township Representative; Buddy Hartley, Little- River Township Representative; Mark <br />Marcoplos, At-Large, Bingham Township; Andrea Rohrbacher, At-Large Chapel .Hill Township; Peter Hallenbeck, Cheeks <br />Township Representative; Rachel -Hawkins, Hillsborough Township Representative; Johnny Randall, At-Large Chapel Hill <br />Township; <br />MEMBERS ABSENT: Judith Wegner, Bingham Township Representative; Lisa Stuckey, Chapel Hill Township Representative; <br />Maxecine Mitchell, At-Large Bingham Township; <br />STAFF PRESENT: Craig Benedict, Planning Director; Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor, Tom Altieri, Comprehensive <br />Planning Supervisor; Perdita Holtz, Planning- Systems Coordinator; Glenn Bowles, Planner II; Tina Love, Administrative <br />Assistant ll <br />OTHERS PRESENT: Sarah Lee, NCDOT; Randy Marshall; Chad Abbott, Summit Consulting; Susan Levy, Habitat for Humanity; <br />George Whiffed; Robert and Elvira Mebane; Annie Whiffed; <br />Documents handed out by statfi~ Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) Public Input Meeting Flyer Draft CTP Highway Map; <br />Draft CTP Public Transportation and Rail Map; Draft CTP Bicycle Map; Draft CTP PedesMan Map; Hard copy of CTP <br />PowerPoinf Presentation <br />Visuals used during meeting: CTP PowerPoint; Access Management PowerPoint <br />AGENDA ITEM 7: CONDITIONAL USE DISTRICT (CLASS A SUP) PROPOSING TO REZONE A TRACT OF LAND OFF OF TINNIN ROAD TO <br />ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A Z8 LOT SUBDIVISION: TO make a reCOmmenda6on t0 the BOCC On an <br />application submitted by Habitat for Humanity to rezone 8.984 acres of land from Rural <br />Residential (R-1) to High Intensity Residential Conditional Use (R-8-CU) in order to develop a 28- <br />lotmajor subdivision, as heard at the May 23, 2011 quarterly public hearing. This is a <br />continuation of-the discussion that occurred at the July 6, 2011 Planning Board meeting <br />Presenter: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor <br />Michael Harvey: I will refer you to the Abstract on page 13. There are three attachments in this document. The first is a letter <br />and documentation submitted by the applicant responding to Planning Board member(s) questions raised at the July 6 meeting <br />as well as their response to the recommended conditions. The second attachment is the staff generated correspondence since <br />the July 6 meeting. Last, the Special Use Permit findings of fact and Conditions Approval. <br />In your abstract, we have summarized the applicants response to several areas of concern or questions ranging from utility line <br />size, the water line flow rate, the looping of the water system in the Richmond Hill Subdivision, the payment of connection fees, <br />the development of sidewalks, connections to open- space, etc. The applicants will be happy to review and share any additional <br />information with the board with respect to their responses. <br />On page 15 and 16, Planning Staff has reaffirmed our recommendation that the applicant has met their burden under the <br />ordinance justifying the approval of this project. The project is located in an area of the county that supports this type of growth. <br />We have made affirmative findings within Attachment 3, Special Use Permit, Findings of Fact. Attachment 3 begins on page 35. <br />As you will recall, there are three General Findings of Fact that have to be made by this board based on the evidence presented <br />at the hearing and at the July 6 Planning Board and based on evidence received this evening. There are in Section 5.3.2 (A) (2). <br />These are specific findings. Staff does not provide a recommendation. The board will have to, as part of your motion, to affirm <br />or not to affirm. <br />Brian Crawford: In Section 2.9.1, we need to say, for instance, in number 1, 2.9.1, we will need to go through each 2.9.1 <br />Section? <br />