Browse
Search
Minutes - 06-25-2001
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Minutes - 06-25-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2015 8:57:17 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:55:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/25/2001
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-25-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001 - 9b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-10a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-10b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-7a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-9e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-9f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-9g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
NSN RES-2001-073 Resolution of Intent to Adopt the 2001-02 Budget
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2001
ORD-2001-019 Budget Amendment #12
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2001
ORD-2001-020 Adoption of 2001-02 Budget, Capital and grant Project Ordinances
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Gordan said that historically in setting impact fees, we have asked the school <br />boards for a recommendation and we have followed that recommendation. Secondly, she asked why <br />we would not want to increase the revenue for CHCCS instead of keeping it the same. She supports the <br />Orange County School Board recommendation of 56°~ and supports 75°l° at a minimum for the Chapel <br />Hill-Carrboro City Schools so that they will have the same amount of increased revenue as the Orange <br />County Schools. <br />Commissioner Carey said that when he voted for the impact fee in the past, he was not voting <br />on the level that was approved because the School Board asked far it. That was not the basis on which <br />he made his decision. He serves the citizens in this County in a reasonable manner. He feels that the <br />proposal he put on the table is a reasonable one. <br />Chair Halkiotis said that he would support the 60°~ level far impact fees for the Chapel Hill- <br />Carrboro City Schools system and 56% for the Orange County schools. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve <br />56% of the maximum supportable impact fee far the Orange County Schools, which was requested by <br />the Orange County School Board. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to approve <br />60°l0 of the maximum supportable impact fee for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools. This is $4,407 <br />for single-family housing and $1,979 for all other housing. <br />VOTE: 3 - 2 (Commissioner Brown would like far the impact fee to go to the maximum fee requested by <br />the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools. Commissioner Gordan said we should support something close <br />to what the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School Board requested and set the fee at $6,000 for single-family <br />housing and $2,694 for all other housing {a reduction from the current $3,000 fee) because the Chapel <br />Hill-Carrboro City Schools desperately need the money due to the rapid influx of new students. <br />These impact fees will be effective July 1, 2001 for building permits issued July 15t and later. <br />6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS -NONE <br />7. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />a. Public Hearing on the Issuance of Refundina Bonds and Adoption of Refundina Bond <br />Orders The Board conducted a public hearing on the advisability of issuing refunding bonds and <br />considered authorizing the issuance of refunding bonds. <br />Finance Director Ken Chavious said that this public hearing was established by the Board at <br />the June 12th work session when a bond order was introduced that would allow the County to pursue a <br />refunding of same bonds that were sold in 1994 and approved by the voters in 1992. It is estimated that <br />the County will save approximately $50,000 annually and over $700,000 aver the remaining life of the <br />bonds. <br />Bond Attorney Bob Jessup said that this public hearing was the next required step in the <br />process set out in the statutes. If the bonds are approved, then they will be combined with the next <br />installment of bonds from the 1997 referendum for a sale at the end of July with the closing set for the <br />middle of August. <br />There were no comments from the public. A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, <br />seconded by Commissioner Brown to close the public hearing. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to adopt <br />the bond order providing for the issuance of up to $24 million in refunding bonds, in accordance with the <br />resolution, which is incorporated herein by reference. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Brown to adopt the <br />resolution, which is incorporated herein by reference, directing the Clerk to publish the notice of the <br />adoption of the bond order. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.