Browse
Search
Minutes - 06-25-2001
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Minutes - 06-25-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2015 8:57:17 AM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:55:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/25/2001
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-25-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001 - 9b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-10a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-10b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-7a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-8h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-9e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-9f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
Agenda - 06-25-2001-9g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 06-25-2001
NSN RES-2001-073 Resolution of Intent to Adopt the 2001-02 Budget
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2001
ORD-2001-019 Budget Amendment #12
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2001
ORD-2001-020 Adoption of 2001-02 Budget, Capital and grant Project Ordinances
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Gordon distributed an analysis of different impact fee scenarios that had been <br />previously generated by the staff. These revenue figures showed actual revenue amounts to be <br />obtained from impact fees (based on the Tischler report). Fifty percent of the maximum supportable <br />impact fee for the Orange County Schools (OCS} would generate $585,000 in additional revenue. For <br />the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools (CHCCS} fifty percent would generate $249,658 less than the current <br />impact fee would generate. She said that one way to give each system an equitable amount of revenue <br />is to provide each system with approximately the same amount of additional revenue. If the OCS is <br />given a fee that is 56% of the maximum supportable fee and CHCCS is provided with 75% of the <br />maximum supportable fee, each system would gain about $700,000 in actual additional funds. She said <br />a calculation of the actual additional revenue is the amount that should be used, rather than the figure <br />that happened to be programmed in the CIP since the latter amount was an old projection. <br />Chair Halkiotis said that he would not support a percentage level that would produce a lower <br />amount from impact fees than what is presently budgeted as revenues from the impact fees. <br />John Link said that the impact fee ordinance indicates that the fee can be set at what the <br />County Commissioners believe is reasonable. Being reasonable includes a fee that is defendable. He <br />asked what is the reasonable amount. Staff has recommended starting with 56% of the maximum <br />supportable fee. He said that, for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schaals, it could be brought up to 60°~ to <br />ensure that there is no revenue lost as explained by Commissioner Gordon. <br />Commissioner Carey calculated the amounts for 60% - $4,407 for single-family homes and <br />$1,979 for all other housing. He does not want either school system to lose any money that they are <br />currently projected to receive. He said that the bottom line is that the impact fee is not going to support <br />the costs for new schools. It is the responsibility of the County Commissioners to provide capital needs <br />far bath school systems. He said that he would support 56% for the Orange County school system and <br />60% for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City school system, but no higher. <br />In answer to a question from Commissioner Jacobs, Planning Director Craig Benedict said <br />that the maximum supportable fee in 1996 when the present fee was set was near $11,000 or 30°~ of the <br />maximum allowable amount. For the Orange County Schools, the $750.00 fee was approximately 10% <br />of the maximum allowable amount. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he would like to do the best we can for both school systems. <br />He said that to the greatest extent possible he would like to bring the two school systems together, <br />treating them as equally as we possibly can. He would start looking at haw we can da a better job in <br />dealing with funding. He said that we need to start looking at this as one whole package. He would like <br />to treat each system the same if possible. He supports 56% of the maximum supportable fee for both <br />school systems. <br />Commissioner Brown said that she would like to see the impact fees generate as much new <br />revenue as possible for each school system. She said that impact fees do not generate the revenue that <br />people might think. However, it is the only way we have for new development to make a contribution to <br />the schools and to make new growth help to pay for itself. The affordable housing issue is more complex <br />than the simplistic approach that somehow impact fees will have a detrimental impact on private <br />developers building affordable housing in either school district. She has not seen any private <br />development build any affordable housing in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools district in many years. <br />The non-profits have made an effort to do so in the Chapel Hill area. She thinks there is an impact on <br />affordable housing in the Orange County School district. She supports moving the impact fees higher for <br />the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools and approving the Orange County schools' recommendation. She <br />asked Nick Didow to come up and speak specifically about what the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School <br />Board has asked the Board of County Commissioners for in terms of the impact fee. <br />Nick Didow, Chair of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School Board, said that the school board <br />has requested that the impact fee be set at 100% of the maximum allowable amount as found in the <br />Tischler analysis. This is $7,345 for single-family and $3,298 for all other residential units. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked how affordable housing was being handled by the Town of <br />Chapel Hill. Commissioner Brown said that her understanding was that the developers actually <br />subsidize the units for the maximum affordable price, which is $120,000. There is also funding-in-lieu <br />that is being turned over to the housing corporation by developers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.