Browse
Search
Minutes - 06-18-2001
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Minutes - 06-18-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 5:15:53 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:55:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/18/2001
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that this part be in the bond referendum. The renovations are also recommended to be in the bond <br />referendum. The total bonds for the Orange County school system would be $20.9 million, with $1.6 <br />million coming from alternative financing. <br />John Link explained the bottom of the chart, which indicated a total of $75 million for bonds, <br />$21.5 million for alternative financing, and $390,000 for pay-as-you-go funds. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked John Link why he did not include money for a third high school in <br />the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School district. John Link said that this is an issue that the County <br />Commissioners need to address. His caution to the Board as they address another high school is <br />that committing to this high school is a commitment of $35 to $40 million. He feels that the County <br />Commissioners need to look at the overall capacity of the high schools in the County before making <br />this commitment. <br />Commissioner Carey asked if some of the renovations to the older schools could be done out of <br />the fund balance for each system in order to reduce the amount of the bond referendum. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked for a discussion about fund balance and how much each school <br />system should keep as a minimum. <br />Assistant County Manager Rod Visser said that there is no statutory requirement that a school <br />system must have a fund balance. The major reason the school system does not have an issue with <br />fund balance is that they have a cash flow that they can depend on. <br />Finance Director Ken Chavious verified that there is no minimum level required far the fund <br />balance of a school system. <br />Rod Visser made reference to a letter from 1986 regarding the working margins of fund <br />balances for the two school systems. For the Orange County system, it is 2.7% of its annual <br />expenditures, and for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro system, it is 5.5%. Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools <br />has received $450,000 more in the current fiscal year from the district tax than was actually budgeted. <br />This brings their fund balance to $4.4 million. The threshold would be $1.8 million. Far the Orange <br />County system, it would need another $450,000 to maintain the 2.7°Io threshold in the fund balance. <br />Commissioner Carey asked if there is any reason why renovations cannot be done from fund <br />balance. John Link said that with the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools they could use the district tax <br />monies for current expense and capital. <br />Commissioner Jacobs questioned why Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools is requesting an <br />increase in the district tax since they have a fund balance of $4.5 million. <br />Commissioner Carey said that the fund balance gives the County and the schools more flexibility <br />to accomplish some of their specific goals. <br />Neil Pedersen said that he does not feel the $4.5 million fund balance takes into account the <br />outstanding bills they have which may be $700,000. Ken Chavious said that the $4.5 million fund <br />balance takes into consideration outstanding bills of $900,000. <br />John Link said that the good news is that the unappropriated fund balance provides the flexibility <br />for both school districts to address some of their needs. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked that a press release be written to correct incorrect information <br />about the fund balances for each system. He said that there has also been misleading numbers for <br />enrollment figures. Also, we need to explain that we try to address mandates and make it clear to our <br />citizens that we are responsive to the school needs and good stewards of the citizens' money. <br />Commissioner Carey agreed saying that we need to try to correct misconceptions. <br />John Link will develop a draft press release and submit it to the Board for their review. <br />Environment and Resource Conservation Director David Stancil made reference to the salman- <br />colored document entitled, "Consideration of Bond Recommendations for Parks and Open Space." <br />The Capital Needs Task Force did not recommend any specific projects for the Lands Legacy <br />program, leaving it to the Board. He summarized each project and indicated whether it met each of <br />the criteria. <br />John Link made reference to the bond requirements. The County Commissioners will need to <br />indicate the maximum amount they are willing to have on the bond referendum. They are not required <br />this month to make the final decision on the projects or the amount. They can make the final <br />decisions on the projects and the amounts in August. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.