Orange County NC Website
Because this project is funded by both an EPA Special Appropriations Grant and a State <br /> Revolving Fund Loan, the State Construction Grants & Loans (CG&L) office must review the <br /> bid documents and other information regarding the project prior to issuing an "Authority to <br /> Award" notice to the County. The deadlines imposed by the SRF Loan process required that <br /> Orange County be issued the "Authority to Award" from the State CG&L office on or before <br /> August 1, 2011, or risk losing the SRF Loan funds. As a part of the Project Bid Information <br /> packet, the CG&L office typically requires that the governing board adopt a Resolution of <br /> Tentative Award, which says the board intends to award the contract to the lowest, <br /> responsible, responsive bidder once given the "Authority to Award" from the State. <br /> In this case, however, the BOCC was on summer breaks when the bids came in. This meeting <br /> is the first opportunity available for the Resolution of Tentative Award. The CG&L office has <br /> granted the County a variance from its normal procedure by allowing the BOCC to adopt the <br /> Resolution of Award now, after the Authority to Award had been issued by the State on August <br /> 1, 2011. Therefore, the Resolution before the Board is a Resolution of Award rather than a <br /> Resolution of Tentative Award because the State has already reviewed the contractor choice <br /> and issued the Authority to Award. <br /> This Resolution, along with the actual contract and supporting documents, will be submitted to <br /> the State CG&L office for review. Submission and approval of the contract documents and <br /> this Resolution are required in order to meet the next funding deadline on September 1, 2011. <br /> J.F. Wilkerson submitted the lowest responsible bid that was responsive. A copy of the <br /> tabulation is Attachment 3. The Resolution of Award is Attachment 4. If the Board awards <br /> this bid, a notice to proceed will be issued in mid-September with an estimated completion date <br /> of December 2012. <br /> B-5 RELATED ALTERNATE `OUTFALL' ENGINEERING DESIGN <br /> After strategic review of the existing and proposed sewer systems in Efland, an alternative <br /> engineering design may create short and long term benefits in costs and service area. A brief <br /> explanation follows. <br /> The present Efland sewer system flows by gravity to the existing McGowan Creek Lift Station <br /> (MCLS) built in 1988 near Efland-Cedar Grove Road. From this collection point sewage is <br /> then a pumped via a sewage force main to the Town of Hillsborough for treatment. The <br /> Central Efland Phase II (area east of and downstream from the MCLS) proposes a new <br /> sewage lift station on Brookhollow Road (BRLS) which collects a new service area that flows <br /> by gravity to this new station that is then pumped `upstream' to the old MCLS. <br /> Since the proposed BRLS is `downstream' from the old MCLS, a new gravity sewer main or <br /> interceptor can be designed to allow existing sewer flows to flow through (without pumping) the <br /> MCLS and continue through this new gravity line (approximately 2,000 LF) to the BRLS. This <br /> alternate design accomplishes several goals: <br /> 1. Eliminates the need for a new lift station (BRLS) to pump to an old lift station (MCLS) <br /> which is in need of approximately $400,000 of repair. <br /> 2. Creates a new interceptor service area (consistent with the Efland-Mebane Small Area <br /> Plan) for additional property and customers that were not included in the original <br /> design. <br />