Browse
Search
Minutes - 06-07-2001
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Minutes - 06-07-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 5:17:11 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:54:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/7/2001
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
strong revenue collections, and a healthy fund balance. The primary source of revenue of the <br />County's budget comes from property taxes, followed by sales tax. <br />Orange County ranks #1 in the state in terms of total contributions toward education. The <br />total funding for education in this proposed budget represents approximately a $4 million <br />increase, which is a 7.5°~ increase overall. There is a trend of widening difference in growth <br />between the Orange County system and the Chapel Hill-Carrboro system. One-half cent has <br />been shifted to current expense from the normal 3-cent earmarking for recurring capital. <br />John Link then explained the formula that must be used by law to fund two school systems <br />within one county. The recommended per pupil allocation is $2,437. He said that the district tax <br />should be reexamined in the Orange County school system. <br />There is now a school health nurse initiative and this year's budget includes $153,726 far <br />the first year of implementation. The goal is to provide a nurse in every school in both districts <br />within four years. <br />John Link pointed out that the Board of County Commissioners is faced with other <br />significant cost increases in the budget - $800,000 in increased Medicaid casts, assumption of <br />the urgent home repair program by the County, increased in funding of mental health, and <br />potential increased funding for child care subsidies. The November 2401 bond will also have <br />same implications. Other issues include Cedar Ridge High School start up casts, the need for <br />alternative solid waste financing, examination of options for EMS transport service delivery, and <br />the update of the County's comprehensive land use plan. <br />Chair Halkiotis said that he does not agree with the projection from DPI of negative 40 <br />students in Orange County schools in the next year. He defended John Link and said that the <br />message came from Raleigh and not the County Manager. He said that these are the numbers <br />that the County Manager was given to work with to come up with the budget. He encouraged <br />those in opposition of the projections from DPI to go and protest at the DPI office. He said that <br />the situation that the County Manager has been put in is dire. He asked the audience to be <br />respectful. <br />Chair Halkiotis also spoke about the district tax that Chapel Hill-Carrboro has and that it <br />has been around for over 50 years. He said that they chose to do that and that he respected <br />that tax and has never envied it, but he respects them for wanting to do that for their schools. <br />He said that this Board of County Commissioners has tried to remedy the equity between the <br />two school systems, but it is not possible when Chapel Hill-Carrboro's district tax generates over <br />11 million dollars. <br />Commissioner Brown asked the County Manager to make brief comments on the impact <br />fee and the proposed district tax and how these two are implemented. <br />John Link explained how the Orange County School Board would establish the district <br />tax for the Orange County school district. He said that the citizens would have to vote to <br />approve the district tax and it would have to come forth as a recommendation from the school <br />board. The impact fee is used to help address the construction of new schools, which is created <br />as a result of new housing and an increase in student population figures. The impact fee is <br />collected at the time the owner gets the certificate of occupancy. The entire amount goes to the <br />school system for school construction. <br />Commissioner Brown clarified that this Board does not make the rules for the per pupil <br />expenditure. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that the Orange County Commissioners, for years, have <br />been trying to get legislative authority to change the impact fee to an impact tax.- He said that <br />there were people in the state legislature who do not want Orange County to have an impact <br />tax, and they do not represent this County, but the County is held hostage by them. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.