Orange County NC Website
There are all kinds of exotic species and the ordinance needs to be clarified. He feels <br />there is no risk and no imminent threat to the citizens of grange County. As a resident of <br />Orange County and one who has been active in the exhibition of these animals, he asked <br />that the ordinance be rejected. <br />Ed Ellesson spoke in support of this ordinance. He said that since 1993 he has <br />been involved with wildlife rehabilitation in North Carolina with a lot of hands-on interaction. <br />He believes that animals feel pain and suffer and that when they are hurt or sick or afraid <br />they have the same kinds of feelings that humans have in similar circumstances. He said <br />that what the public sees in the circus performances does not reveal to them how the <br />animals are trained. He said that you have to hurt and abuse wild animals to get them to <br />do things. The circuses put chains on the animals and damage them with hooks. The only <br />way to stop the abuse is to stop the performances. <br />Vaughn Compton asked if any of these rules would affect the Efland Rodeo and <br />it was answered that it would nat. <br />Dietrich Hawgwitz said that he has lived in this County for thirty years. He <br />expressed his support for this ordinance. His reasons include the statistics about captive <br />animals and the injuries to humans. He spoke about the endless use of abuses and haw <br />the animals are kept in tiny cages and have to endure extreme heat and cold. Another <br />reason he opposes the performances is because the animals are isolated specimens and <br />it is exactly the wrong kind of education for our young children. He said that we do not <br />want to put anyone out of business. He said that the people who are opposed to this <br />ordinance came from outside business interest. He said that there were a growing number <br />of circuses without the exploitation of animals. <br />Heidi Herriott, Circus Unit Manager for the outdoor Amusement Business <br />Association and a third generation of a family of American animal trainers, said that they <br />were opposed to this ordinance for the following reasons: <br />• circus animals were regulated by the state, local, and federal level <br />•:• circus animals were subject to unbelievable scrutiny <br />• abuse of animals was recognizable and some of the documentation on the <br />Internet about abuse was inaccurate, and <br />• they were federally licensed by the United States Department of Agriculture <br />She said that she was a believer in animal welfare and animal welfare celebrates the <br />bond and the interaction between animals and humans. She said that there were only a <br />handful of communities who have passed this kind of ordinance. She said that she is here <br />because she works with animals and she cares about her animals and this ordinance <br />would prohibit her and her members from appearing in grange County and providing <br />something they are very proud of, which is live, safe, affordable family entertainment. She <br />said that she could speak to some of the questions about contacting circuses and the <br />permitting processes. <br />Cam Cridlebaugh is a realtor in High Point, secretary of the Circus Fans <br />Association of America far the North Carolina branch, a member of the Circus Historical <br />Society, and has a small traveling circus that works with elephants. He said that his <br />animals were not abused and were trained with the use of sugar cubes and marshmallows. <br />This small traveling show has a capacity of 1,500, which means that the kids can get up <br />close to the performers and kids and parents have a fantastic time. He said that this bill <br />would be disastrous to the small traveling shows. He said that if this ordinance was <br />passed, the first thing you know it will be against the law to eat Kentucky Fried Chicken, <br />and you can forget about McDonald's. <br />