Orange County NC Website
PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Dr. Lauren Powers, an exotic pet veterinarian in Chapel Hill and a board <br />member of the Orange County Animal Protection Society, stated the position of the <br />Orange County APS. They are in support of the two ordinances banning the ownership of <br />bath wild and dangerous animals in Orange County. She said that there was some <br />concern over the last few months from some of her clients and colleagues about whether <br />this will affect ownership of exotic pets that are not necessarily wild or dangerous to people <br />or property, including ferrets and iguanas. She said that it has been made clear to her that <br />the ordinances should have no bearing on exotic pet ownership in Orange County. <br />Emily Villanova made reference to Section 2, Keeping of Wild and Dangerous <br />Animals Prohibited. She said that she was concerned that this was too broad. She asked <br />if it included feeding squirrels and birds out of a bird feeder. She asked that the language <br />be narrowed. Rosemary Summers said that this ordinance would only apply to animals <br />that are wild and dangerous. County Attorney Geoffrey Gledhill said that the term "wild <br />and dangerous animals" is defined in Section 2 and would not include birds. <br />Sitha Bigger, manager of the Triangle Metro Zoo in Franklin County, said that <br />the ownership of exotic animals, whether dangerous or not, is not necessarily a bad thing. <br />She said that some dogs and cats are more dangerous than the animals on the list. She <br />would also like to address the point that there are small businesses making a living by <br />selling exotic animals and this ordinance would affect those businesses. <br />Larry Seibel, owner of the Triangle Metro Zoo, said that he was an animal <br />control officer in a large city in the Midwest for five years and he never came across a <br />problem with exotic animals. He feels the definition of wild and dangerous is too broad <br />because mast wild animals are animals that are raised in captivity. The facilities are <br />inspected without any notice to make sure the animal is well cared for and that the people <br />are safe. He said that when he was an animal control officer, there were many dog bites <br />and some farm animals were dangerous. He is opposed to this ordinance. <br />Vaughn Compton, poultry farmer in northern Orange County, noted that if these <br />rules are passed that he could not start an alligator farm. He said that this is a way that <br />the farmers are recycling their dead chickens. He distributed some brochures and <br />explained the recycling process. <br />Robert Nichols asked if this ordinance includes snakes. He feels that it should <br />include snakes if it does not. Rosemary Summers said that the ordinance does include <br />snakes that are poisonous or crushing and greater than six feet long. <br />Rosemary Summers said that she spoke to Vaughn Campton about the alligator <br />farms and she thinks there should be some research into the kinds of things that chickens <br />may transmit to alligators. <br />Dori Canner said that she read somewhere that if the Commissioners see a <br />reason to include more animals in the future, then they could be added. She asked if this <br />would require another meeting or a vote. Rosemary Summers said that the ordinance <br />speaks to this. She read from the ordinance as follows: "Additions to or deletions from the <br />animals regulated herein may be made only if the Board determines after receiving <br />evidence that such animals, because of habit, made of life, or natural instinct are either <br />capable or incapable of being domesticated; requires the exercise of art, farce, or skill to <br />keep them safely in subjection; and would or would not create a reasonable likelihood of a <br />hazard to the public." This would require Board approval and a public hearing. <br />Melissa Lozoff said that she would not feel comfortable living next door to an <br />alligator farm. <br />Commissioner Carey said that he does support this ordinance. He is willing to <br />wait until some of the questions that are mentioned above are answered before voting to <br />