Browse
Search
Minutes - 05-15-2001
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Minutes - 05-15-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 5:20:01 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:54:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/15/2001
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-15-2001-10a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-5b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-5c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-7a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-8a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-8b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-8c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-8d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-8e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-8f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-8g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-8h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-8i
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-8j
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-8k
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-8l
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-9b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-9e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
Agenda - 05-15-2001-9f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-15-2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Jacobs asked about considering .92-acre lots where it is outside the 20-year transition <br />area. He also asked about having a combined development as opposed to one that is strictly <br />serviced with sewer. Scott Radway said that it would not be reasonable to start over with the plan <br />because it has taken so long to meet with the Board of County Commissioners about these policy <br />155Ue5. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked County Attorney Geoffrey Gledhill if the Board could vote on <br />the sewer issue and then vote to table the subdivision issue. Geoffrey Gledhill said that the issue of <br />extending the sewer to the project has not been placed in front of the Board. The issue can be put in <br />front of the Board. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Carey to <br />approve the staff recommendation, which is to deny the preliminary plan of McGowan Creek <br />subdivision, in accordance with the Resolution of Denial, which is incorporated herein by reference. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he understands and appreciates the administration's <br />recommendation. However, he thinks that this development plan is very commendable but the <br />location might not be the best. He referred to page 19, the Planning Board minutes, and said that one <br />of the representatives for the developer told the Planning Board that policy issues were not its <br />responsibility. He agrees that the Planning Board is not to make policy decisions, but he encouraged <br />the Planning Board at all times to consider policy issues. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />d. High Rock Farms Phase One Preliminary Plan <br />The Board was to consider a preliminary plan for phase one of the proposed High Rack <br />Farms subdivision. However, this item was postponed to a future meeting. <br />e. Outline of Efland Sewer System Issues Related to Extensions to Undeveloped <br />Properties The Board was to consider a course of action regarding requests for extensions <br />to undeveloped properties served by the Efland area sewer system. However, this item was <br />postponed to a future meeting. <br />f. High Rock Village Subdivision Preliminary Plan <br />The Board was to consider a preliminary plan for the proposed High Rock Village <br />subdivision. However, this item was postponed to a future meeting. <br />10. REPORTS <br />a. Follow-up Report on Student Population Proiections <br />This item was presented after the Consent Agenda before the Decision Agenda. <br />John Link said that at the April 30`" work session, staff was requested to add two additional <br />lines to the graphs that were presented that evening. He said that ten years ago, the school <br />construction standards committee met and with no progress they reverted back to DPI numbers. He <br />asked that once the discussion is finished that the Board submit this information to the Capital Needs <br />Advisory Task Force tomorrow evening. <br />Rod Visser said that at the April 30t" work session, the Commissioners reviewed several <br />different mechanisms for projecting student population projections over the next 10 years. The Board <br />asked the staff to project three-year and five-year projections based on historical average. <br />Commissioner Gordon agreed that this information should go to the Capital Needs <br />Advisory Task Force. <br />Commissioner Carey said that this was a lot of information and very confusing to him. He <br />is not opposed to sending it to the Capital Needs Advisory Task Force. He feels that this Board <br />should make a decision on a planning foundation for projecting enrollment or it will not mean anything <br />to the Capital Needs Advisory Task Force. The Board of County Commissioners will make the <br />ultimate decision on the band issue. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.