Browse
Search
Minutes - 05-01-2001
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Minutes - 05-01-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 5:21:13 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:54:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/1/2001
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-01-2001-10a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-5b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-5c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-5d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-5e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-7a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8g
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8h
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8i
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8j
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8k
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8l
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-8m
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-9b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-9e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
Agenda - 05-01-2001-9f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 05-01-2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
complex part of the motion. He said that, in private road subdivisions, we are requesting that <br />they be twice the required lot size. Most of the discussion about item six was to reduce the provision <br />of requiring twice the lot size when there is 50°~ or more open space in the subdivision. The staff is <br />recommending that the lot size be lowered from 80,000 square feet {almost two acres) to 60,000 <br />square feet (1.38 acres), if at least 50°~ open space is provided. In a typical 12-lot subdivision the <br />amount of open space is 33°~ or 11 acres. If the lots are 60,000 square feet, there would be 50°~ <br />open space, or 16.5 acres. He said that he believes that there was enough discussion during the <br />public hearing process that the County Commissioners could adopt the provision of having a 60,000- <br />square foot lot in a private road subdivision with at least 50°!° open space. It would not have to go to <br />public hearing. <br />Commissioner Gordon made some changes to the charts, which were so noted by Craig <br />Benedict. <br />By consensus the County Commissioners agreed to take the chart on page 11 and <br />separate the templates for three ar fewer lots and 4-12 lots. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to page four and the statement, "A private road <br />shall be deemed justified far a minor subdivision resulting in no more than three lots. In such <br />subdivisions a private access easement may be granted to allow an adjacent lot to access the private <br />road in order to reduce the number of access points on a public road." She questioned whether or not <br />the rest of the paragraph could be removed regarding the intent of the provision. She said that she <br />listened to the tape of the meeting and when the motion was listed out, it did not specifically request <br />that this be deleted. She asked if it was the intent of the Board to leave this in. She thinks it should <br />be sent to hearing for deletion. <br />Geoffrey Gledhill said that the only way to get clarity on this issue was to send it back to <br />public hearing and look at it again. <br />By consensus the County Commissioners agreed that this ("the intent of this provision..." <br />on page four) would be placed on the quarterly public hearing agenda on May 29tH <br />Commissioner Brown verified that there would be no increase in density as a result of the <br />sliding scale down to a 60,000 square foot lot. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that it would be cleaner to take the sliding scale to public <br />hearing because page five includes what was adopted and page 15 is in conflict with that. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he would feel comfortable in not going back to public <br />hearing if the County Attorney so recommends. He feels that this is a good way to achieve more <br />open space with the same amount of density and encourage some developers to provide more open <br />space. <br />Geoffrey Gledhill said that his feeling was that at the public hearing on October 10t", the <br />Board did not adopt the sliding scale ar anything like it. However, the public hearing that was held <br />was broad enough to include it. Therefore, it is available to be adopted if the public hearing has <br />already been accomplished. He said that it would also be okay to take it back to public hearing. <br />Technically, the County Commissioners could adopt this tonight. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to take <br />the sliding scale issue back to public hearing on May 29tH <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />At this time, the Board agreed to extend the meeting to 11:00 p.m. and then adjourn into <br />closed session. <br />e. Legal Advertisement for May 29, 2001 Quarterly Public Hearincl <br />The Board considered authorizing a legal advertisement for the scheduled May 29, 2001 <br />quarterly public hearing. <br />Craig Benedict summarized the agenda items for the quarterly public hearing as stated in <br />the agenda abstract. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked Craig Benedict to give the County Commissioners the <br />background information on the text amendments at the same time the public hearing notice is <br />presented. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.