Browse
Search
Minutes - 04-30-2001
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Minutes - 04-30-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 5:21:27 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:53:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/30/2001
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Gordon noted that, since a new elementary school has 600 seats, the <br />Orange County system has built an extra elementary school. <br />Chair Halkiotis mentioned that one of Orange County's oldest schools, Hillsborough <br />Elementary School, might at some time in the future have to be closed because of its age. <br />Susan Halkiotis said that when they renovated Hillsborough Elementary School, the <br />plan was to make a determination as to whether ar not they will keep this school or replace it. The <br />School Board has decided to keep using it. <br />Far the Orange County middle schools, current capacity is 1,466 and the level of <br />service at 107°!o is 1,569. The 4th month membership number is 1,504. <br />Randy Bridges, Superintendent of the Orange County Schools, said that he has used <br />enrollment figures and not membership figures. <br />Discussion ensued about using membership figures instead of enrollment figures. <br />Membership figures include the students actually attending a school, while enrollment figures <br />include all students registered at a school regardless of whether they have dropped out or <br />graduated. The enrollment figures for the Orange County system also includes students enrolled <br />in Charter schools. <br />Commissioner Brown asked if the declining increase in membership in the Planning <br />Department's projections was based on the fact that Chapel Hill would be built out in the next ten <br />years. Craig Benedict said that in probably 10 to 15 years there would be more housing created in <br />the Orange County system instead of Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School system. This may not <br />mean that there will be mare students in the Orange County system. <br />Donna Dean said that the capacity for high schools in the Orange County system when <br />Cedar Ridge High School comes on line will be 2518 and the level of service at 110°~ would be <br />almost 2700. Right now the 110°~ level of service is 1624. <br />Chair Halkiotis said that he is concerned about the difference in enrollment and <br />membership numbers. He said that he recalls that a definition was developed for these two terms. <br />He asked for the minutes from the School Facilities Task Force meetings. He said that he feels <br />that alternatives for sharing space need to be explored. <br />Commissioner Jacobs questioned if this information should be sent forward to the <br />Capital Needs Advisory Task Force. Chair Halkiotis said that he needs more time to study the <br />information before it is sent forward. If the Capital Needs Advisory Task Force needs additional <br />time they could add a couple of additional meetings. <br />John Link said that he would contact both superintendents and clarify the information <br />they have provided to be sure that they were using the same form of projections. <br />Commissioner Gordan feels that the Capital Needs Advisory Task Force needs this <br />information before their last meeting. <br />Commissioner Brown asked how far we are in sharing resource capacity. Dana <br />Thompson said that they have not yet begun those discussions. Commissioner Brown said that <br />she would think that both school systems would be willing to work together to accommodate the <br />school children. She encourages both systems to work on sharing their resources. <br />e. Preliminary review of Budget Hiahliahts <br />Budget Director Donna Dean summarized this. Property taxes make up about 62°~ of <br />the general fund revenues for fiscal year 2001-2002. The preliminary real property valuation <br />projections are up about 26.2%. The preliminary valuation for the fiscal year is about $7.7 billion. <br />The current tax rate was adjusted downward to offset the increase in real property valuation. The <br />current tax rate is 92.9 cents. The preliminary projected equivalent tax rate is 78.5 to 79 cents. <br />She said that one cent on the tax rate would generate between $840,000 and $850,000 in <br />revenues for next year. <br />Commissioner Brown asked how long the 79 cents would last. Rod Visser said that in <br />1993, the tax rate was 84.25 cents before revaluation and 74.25 after revaluation. In 1997, the tax <br />rate was reduced from 99.75 cents to an equalization rate of 84 cents. This year, it has gone from <br />84 cents to 92.9 cents, with an equalization rate of 78 or 79 cents. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked about the tax implications of the projected bond <br />referendum and Donna Dean said that the increase would be 7.7 cents over the next three years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.