Browse
Search
Minutes - 04-19-2001
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Minutes - 04-19-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 5:22:09 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:53:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/19/2001
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-19-2001-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 04-19-2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
transportation far the Triangle over the next 25 years. The four mayors all agree that doing nothing <br />about transportation in the Triangle is not an option. He said that it was quite likely that the Triangle <br />region would experience a 111 % population growth over the next 25 years. The vehicle miles <br />traveled will increase 144%. He said that there would have to be mass transit to deal with this <br />problem. He said that there has to be more four-lane arterial roads to encourage cars to stay off I-40. <br />He spoke about freeway improvements, surface streets, managed lanes, pedestrian and bicycle <br />facilities, and regional and local transit. He said that it would take 10 billion dollars mare than the 7.7 <br />billion dollars to accomplish these goals, which will keep mobility at its current state in the Triangle. <br />This amounts to about $8,300 per person in the Triangle aver the next 25 years. He said that the <br />federal government could fund two billion dollars in mass transit. He stressed the importance of a <br />multi-modal strategy. There will have to be cooperation from all levels of government. Each level of <br />government should try to use local resources before going to the state for funding. He asked that the <br />governing boards consider a resolution that can be presented to the legislature. <br />Mayor Waldorf said that DCHC and CAMPO have officially endorsed this study. She made <br />reference to the memo from three of the four mayors and said that it was very important to have the <br />endorsement of the elected officials throughout the region. She spoke about possible funding options <br />such as RTP, transportation impact fees, sales tax increases, and aone-percent real estate transfer <br />tax. She asked that all elected officials endorse this study and consider supporting other measures to <br />move this along. <br />2. SHAPING ORANGE COUNTY'S FUTURE REPORT <br />Chair Halkiotis pointed out that items 2-6 were not public hearings, but a chance for all elected <br />officials to get up to speed on the issues. <br />Environment and Resource Conservation Director David Stancil introduced Jay Bryan, a <br />member of the Shaping Orange County's Future steering committee, who led the conversation. He <br />read the two questions on the agenda abstract to facilitate the discussion, as follows: <br />1. Which recommendation from the Task Force report do elected officials feel will improve the <br />quality of life for County residents by the year 2030? <br />2. What are the mast important points to convey to the Task Force as they wrap up their work <br />and issue their final report? <br />Jackie Gist that she has heard over and over that the document needs to give equal weight to <br />social issues as it does to other issues. <br />Jim Ward said that we could continue forever to want to see the report done differently. He <br />feels that the public advisory role has run its course. He feels we should value the document more or <br />less as it is and give it the value that would make it part of the Assembly of Governments meetings <br />and came to some resolution at this level. He encouraged the governmental agencies to start <br />addressing this and making some decisions. He feels that this report needs to move ahead. <br />Jay Bryan asked if the Chapel Hill Town Council had ever reached same critical response to <br />the report and Jim Ward said no because it was not a priority and the document was so large. <br />Diana McDuffee said that it is a wonderful document. When the Carrboro Board discussed it, <br />they felt it was overly prescriptive in some places and general in other places. She said that this <br />report and the report about transportation lay out some broad guidelines of how to come together on <br />certain topics and move ahead. <br />Joyce Brown said that this report does recommend cooperative attempts to reach solutions to <br />some of the problems. One of the real fears of the group was that the document would be just <br />another report that would sit on a shelf. Such a tremendous amount of work has gone into it and we <br />really need to work out some way of using the report and of letting the task force know about some of <br />the concerns. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.