Browse
Search
Minutes 05-23-2011
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Minutes 05-23-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2015 2:26:00 PM
Creation date
8/24/2011 4:46:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/2011
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-23-2011
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C6
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C7
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
think the applicant is going to have to respond in writing to the Planning Board and County <br /> Commissioners as well. If you will begin on page 250 of the abstract, going through <br /> approximately page 254, we have taken liberty of trying to provide basic responses to the <br /> requirements Orange County has imposed on applicants desiring to develop a school within the <br /> County. Some of those conditions, in fact one condition beginning on page 254, concerning the <br /> park and ride facility—you will note that the County Planning staff has indicated that it is our <br /> opinion that there is no need for such a facility at this site. <br /> The applicant hasn't proposed it and we don't deem it necessary that they incorporate a <br /> park and ride facility for this particular location. You will also note that the site plan that has <br /> been submitted to you does show the required mandated two access points. The applicant has <br /> been made aware that they are going to have to obtain the necessary driveway permit from the <br /> North Carolina Department of Transportation and install that to address access management <br /> traffic issues. <br /> I believe that we have provided the basic answers within the abstract on the pages that <br /> I've sited that all of the specific standards be included. Within your packet are correspondence <br /> from the various County staff people, specifically the Fire Marshall, the Sheriff's Office, Rich <br /> Shaw with DEAPR ( Department of Environment, Agriculture, Parks and Recreation) with <br /> respect to review of this application. We are confident as we continue to move forward we can <br /> address the majority of these questions and concerns with the applicant's assistance. <br /> Regarding the septic issue, in consultation with Mr. Neal, the church and the applicant <br /> have been working with Environmental Health and they are continuing to have meetings and <br /> dialogue as necessary. It is my understanding that one of the recommendations of the Health <br /> Department is going to be that the existing system is going to have to be expanded in order to <br /> accommodate these 12 students. As we typically do, staff will be recommending formal <br /> conditions at the Planning Board level, which will then be reviewed by the County <br /> Commissioners. Those conditions historically and typically have always been that all <br /> appropriate permits are obtained by the applicant before occupancy. The answer to the <br /> question of what happens if they cannot secure those permits is that they don't open. That's <br /> just a simple answer to that question. We will continue to work with the applicant to supply the <br /> necessary information to address the questions posed here this evening and if you have any <br /> additional questions, I'll answer them. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs: Page 252 talks about screening. It says that, "landscaping <br /> and buffering plan appears to be consistent with the requirements of the ordinance." So, does <br /> that mean that additional screening is required or the screening that's there, especially in the <br /> parking area is sufficient? <br /> Michael Harvey: No sir, we determined existing screening is sufficient to comply with <br /> the requirement of the code. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs: Is there any kind of requirement for a fenced area for a <br /> school? <br /> Michael Harvey: No, sir. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs: So, presumably, there were some safety concerns expressed <br /> by neighbors. That would solely fall under the purview of the teachers and the staff of the <br /> facility to make sure that the students were supervised and did not venture off the site. <br /> Michael Harvey: Correct, sir. I will, however, point out the existing recreation at the <br /> existing playground does have a fence around it to separate it from the church facility. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs: I just had a question for our Attorney. Is it germane, in a <br /> special use permit, to be asking why a facility is moving from one place to another? <br /> John Roberts: If the Board of County Commissioners determines it's germane, then <br /> yes it is. You are directed, commended by your ordinance to ask questions to determine the <br /> competent material and substantial evidence that support the project's compliance with various <br /> regulations. Whether the applicant has met the burden of proof, you have to make that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.