Browse
Search
Minutes 05-23-2011
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Minutes 05-23-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2015 2:26:00 PM
Creation date
8/24/2011 4:46:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/2011
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-23-2011
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C6
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
Agenda - 05-23-2011 - C7
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-23-2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- Refer the matter to the Planning Board with a request that a recommendation be <br /> retumed to the Board of County Commissioners in time for the June 21, 2011 <br /> BOCC regular meeting <br /> - Adjourn the public hearing until June 21, 2011 in order to receive and accept the <br /> Planning Board's recommendation and any submitted written comments. <br /> Land Use Category Descriptions <br /> From: <br /> Agricultural Residential—prevailing land uses are related to the land (agriculture, forestry) <br /> and appropriate for continuation of these uses. <br /> To: CITAN—Land appropriate for retail, manufacturing, office, and multi-family (Area B) <br /> And <br /> 10-Year Transition—suitable for higher density residential where public water/sewer is <br /> planned or exists. (Area C) <br /> Public Comment <br /> Gloria Martin said that she lives in Area A. She asked how this impacted her and her <br /> property in the future. <br /> Tom Altieri said that the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Use Element Map that goes with <br /> it is intended to express a vision for future land uses in the County. It is a general map <br /> encompassing large areas showing where the commercial and residential areas are to go. This <br /> map is being amended now. This land could potentially be amended from an agricultural residential <br /> to a CITAN. If that were done then any of the other non-residential zoning districts could be applied <br /> for. This only creates potential for a rezoning where otherwise there is none. <br /> Gloria Martin asked if they were safe on their property even if it is rezoned and it was <br /> answered yes. She does not want to be forced to sell her property if an industry rezones. <br /> Dan Wilson asked what this would do to the property tax values. Craig Benedict said that the <br /> value of the property will remain the same if the property remains AR. The tax value is based on <br /> surrounding property sales. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs clarified that if anything goes around residential areas, there will be <br /> buffers around the property to mitigate the impact. He said that, realistically, if there is water and <br /> sewer in this area, it will put a lot of pressure for people to buy it for economic development <br /> purposes, which is the idea. People may offer residents more money for their property and people <br /> may build around residential areas, but it will still be up to the property owners what they do to their <br /> property. He said that he wants to be clear that water and sewer is a huge investment because it <br /> was determined in the Efland/Mebane Small Area Plan that development should occur here. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.