Browse
Search
Minutes 06-07-2011
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Minutes 06-07-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2015 2:23:35 PM
Creation date
8/24/2011 11:49:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/7/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-07-2011
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 12a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 12b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 12c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 12d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 12e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 12f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 12g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 12h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 4a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 4b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5i
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5j
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5k
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5l
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5m
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5n
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5o
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 5p
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 8a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 8b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 8c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - 9a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011 - Information Item
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
Agenda - 06-07-2011-7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 06-07-2011
RES-2011-056 Resolution in Support of Smart Start and More at Four
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-057 Resolution Appointing Jenkins Crayton To A Two Year Term as Tax Administrator
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-058 Resolution approving Motor Vehicle Property Tax Release/Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-059 Resolution Acknowledging Results from 2010 Census
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Town limits of Chapel Hill. All of the investment within Durham County will be paid for by <br /> Durham County. <br /> Regarding the bus rapid transit in Chapel Hill, there is a park and ride lot on Eubanks <br /> Road and Chapel Hill Transit is proposing some bus-only lanes on Martin Luther King from <br /> Eubanks Road down to Estes Drive, which is three miles. The preliminary cost is $25 million <br /> for this. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that Triangle Transit staff was helpful in getting her <br /> information and she had asked for some specific information that needs to be shared with the <br /> Board of Commissioners. She then shared some information about the cost of the rail line. <br /> For the segment of the line in Orange County, the cost for 2.89 miles is $223 million; in the <br /> part of Chapel Hill that is in Durham County, the cost for 0.88 miles is $73 million; and in rest of <br /> Durham County the cost for 13.47 miles is $911 million. She thinks that all of these numbers <br /> need to be verified. She said that the cost per mile that Orange County is paying is more than <br /> the cost per mile that Durham is paying. She thinks that this is an excellent overview, but <br /> some of the details are still needed to fully understand this. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT: <br /> Patrick Mulkey is a resident of Bingham Township. He said that there has been change <br /> since the election in 2008 and every level of government is suffering. He said that he does not <br /> share the optimism for the economy that the speakers have. He said that they are in for some <br /> long-term changes in how things are done. He said that this is a multi-million dollar plan over a <br /> 20+ year commitment. He said that in the past, the County Commissioners have always said <br /> they cannot make those types of long-term commitments. He knows that this %2-cent sales tax <br /> will eventually come up on a referendum, but he does not think this is the time. He also asked <br /> if the 3.6% sales tax growth was per year. <br /> Patrick McDonough said that, with the sales tax growth, they are looking at long-term <br /> and short-term growth rates. The 3.6% is not until 2015. Regarding borrowing, the rail <br /> infrastructure in Orange County will be $330 million. They are looking at borrowing 10% that <br /> will begin in 2019-2022. He is happy to share the financial information with anybody. <br /> Chair Pelissier clarified that the capital investment for the light rail presumes federal <br /> and state monies, which is why the County would not be borrowing that sum of money, <br /> because it presumes that there would be money from other sources. <br /> Chair Pelissier said that the County Commissioners have before them a request from <br /> the Durham County Board of County Commissioners to adopt in principle the financial plan. <br /> She said that the Orange County Board of Commissioners has not said that it is comfortable <br /> with the financial plan. She asked what it means to adopt the financial plan in principle. She is <br /> concerned that this financial plan makes assumptions about cost sharing, and if it is adopted in <br /> principle, she is worrying that it is agreement to a cost-sharing. <br /> John Roberts said that he would recommend that the Board of County Commissioners <br /> not adopt anything in principle until it has been reviewed by the Finance and County Attorney's <br /> offices. <br /> Commissioner McKee said that he is not yet comfortable with the financial plan. He is <br /> concerned that if the County Commissioners adopt anything in principle that it would mean that <br /> they are implying that they are supportive of the plan and signaling that a %2-cent sales tax <br /> would be put on the ballot. He would prefer to have public hearings about this. <br /> Commissioner Gordon said that it would be hard to adopt tonight without due diligence <br /> about this plan but there is another meeting on June 21St, which is before the MPO vote on <br /> 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.