Browse
Search
Minutes 05-24-2011
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Minutes 05-24-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2015 2:25:11 PM
Creation date
8/24/2011 11:15:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/24/2011
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-24-2011
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 05-24-2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
By comparison, in Wake and Chatham Counties - Every convenience center is open on <br /> Sunday and on every holiday except Christmas and Thanksgiving. Most of the centers are <br /> open 7 days a week. <br /> We realize that there's a cost—and we are willing to pay for the services that we, as <br /> rural customers, use. But not for services that we do not need. <br /> For example: <br /> • There are 21,000 rural households in Orange County. Of these, 12000 already pay for <br /> curbside recycling services from the county. Yet only 60% of this group uses these <br /> services. That's 7,200 households, roughly 1/3 of rural households. <br /> • On the other hand, 2/3rds of the rural households use the convenience centers. And <br /> they consider this a basic service, like schools, libraries and other services that we pay <br /> for with our taxes. <br /> We are disappointed that this basic service is being singled out for a tiered fee. It <br /> artificially separates rural residents from the towns, and assumes that all rural residents are the <br /> same. Already there's a 1/3 vs. 2/3 dichotomy in the way the rural community uses these <br /> services. Clearly one size does not fit all. <br /> Isn't it possible, preferable, and economically reasonable to devise a service model that <br /> distinguishes curbside users from convenience center users? And isn't it more reasonable to <br /> charge a single fee for each group. One fee, not three. One understandable fee assessed for <br /> the services used. <br /> We have a petition signed by people from the Schley Community that asks you to <br /> 1. oppose any new property tax fees for solid waste convenience centers, for the next 5 <br /> years <br /> 2. oppose improvements like trash compactors, dump ramps, and paving for the next 5 <br /> years <br /> 3. support reinstating a 6 day per week schedule, including Sunday. <br /> Please open all the convenience centers on Sunday and delay the new solid waste fee <br /> until there is a meaningful service model for residents in the rural parts of the county. Please <br /> assure us that residents will be invited to participate in the developing a service that that makes <br /> sense. <br /> Thank you" <br /> Steve Graf read from a prepared statement: <br /> "As you know, Orange County Voice is on record as opposing the $3 million capital <br /> project to pave the convenience centers and add compactors. It's not a bad idea. It's just bad <br /> timing. <br /> From our perspective—except for the hours - the convenience centers are not broken. <br /> The county is not planning to go to Durham in the near future, so hauling efficiencies are no <br /> longer a pressing issue. <br /> Our concern is that there's no long term vision —and we risk investing in automation, <br /> paving and other infrastructure that's designed around a landfill that's soon to close. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.