Browse
Search
Minutes 04-12-2011
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Minutes 04-12-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2015 2:41:38 PM
Creation date
8/24/2011 8:35:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/12/2011
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-12-2011
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 04-12-2011
Agenda - 04-12-2011 - 1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 04-12-2011
Agenda - 04-12-2011 - 2
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 04-12-2011
Agenda - 04-12-2011 - 3
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 04-12-2011
Agenda - 04-12-2011 - 4
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 04-12-2011
Agenda - 04-12-2011 - 5
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 04-12-2011
Agenda - 04-12-2011 - 6
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 04-12-2011
Agenda - 04-12-2011 - 7
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2011\Agenda - 04-12-2011
RES-2011-035 Resolution Expressing Orange County’s Opposition to Senate Bill 183
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
RES-2011-036 Resolution Expressing Orange County’s Opposition To Senate Bill 462 and House Bill 574
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
•Priority 5 — Develop relationships (business, other agencies, jurisdictions) to provide services <br /> Where Do We Go From Here? <br /> •Deep, Thought-provoking Issues <br /> •What Should Staff Bring Back Next? <br /> •Board feedback on <br /> —Is the time right, <br /> —Options for pursuing a plan, <br /> —Parameters for proceeding (scope, basis), <br /> —How to engage towns and school systems <br /> —Other? <br /> Dave Stancil said that Wake County's plan is a very good model for Orange County. <br /> Commissioner Hemminger said that she is very excited about this and she likes hybrid <br /> 3. She would like to have some citizen input. She wants to fill in the gaps with what is <br /> needed. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs agreed with Commissioner Hemminger and said that it is good to <br /> get back on top of this, having reached a good pausing point. He likes the hybrid idea also. <br /> He said that the non-profits are not mentioned here. He thinks that it is important to add non- <br /> profits as an element besides the schools and the towns. He would like to talk about merging <br /> the recreation departments of the three governments. He said that he would like to have an <br /> understanding about how to regard university students as far as recreational opportunities. <br /> Commissioner Yuhasz said that he would like to see more clarity and usage of the <br /> school facilities and how these will be made available for public use. <br /> Commissioner Gordon made reference to the 2000 plan and said that this shows how <br /> the vision was realized. There was systematic land banking, which became known as the <br /> Lands Legacy Program. She agreed that a plan is needed and she likes hybrid option 3, if the <br /> County can afford it. She said that there is a history of cooperation between the jurisdictions <br /> that can be built upon. <br /> Commissioner Foushee offered her support for most of the comments that have been <br /> made, especially with Commissioner Gordon's last statement in that the County needs a <br /> comprehensive plan that involves coordination with the other governmental entities. She <br /> would not want what is brought forward to be stunted by trying to make something happen that <br /> will not happen. She is more concerned with filling in the gaps of recreational opportunities for <br /> people who do not have easy access. She likes option 3, but as she read it, she thought <br /> about the budget process and looking into the resources the County already has. <br /> Chair Pelissier said that Elementary School #11 would be a good opportunity to talk <br /> about a new facility where something different could be done. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs asked what the direction is from the Board. <br /> Dave Stancil said that he would create a more concrete recommendation for <br /> proceeding with the creation of a comprehensive master plan. A lot of the comments will be <br /> incorporated into the plan process. He said that he regrets not mentioning the non-profits <br /> because he intends for them to be partners in this process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.