Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-23-2011 - 9b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2011
>
Agenda - 08-23-2011
>
Agenda - 08-23-2011 - 9b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2011 2:11:10 PM
Creation date
8/19/2011 2:11:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/23/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Minutes 08-23-2011
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />State And focal ~over_nment Ratings Ar_e-Not <br />Directly constrain-pd By That of The U,S, <br />Sovereign <br />Despite Standard & Poor's Ratings Services' downgrade of the U.S. sovereign debt rating to AA+/Negative/A-1+, we <br />may still assign a 'AAA' rating to some state and local governments. <br />We do not directly link our ratings on U.S. state and local governments to that of the U.S. sovereign debt rating for <br />reasons outlined in our criteria. However, we recognize generally that U.S. state and local governments'economic <br />performances frequently similar-to the nation and they share responsibility for some spending items with the <br />federal government. Yet individual state and local governments' funding interdependencies with the federal <br />government vary considerably. A minority of state-and local obligors rated by Standard & Poor's have achieved the <br />highest long-term rating of 'AAA'. We expect that many of these obligors, particularly those with relatively low <br />levels of funding interdependencies with the federal government or those that, in our view, are likely to manage <br />declines in federal funding without weakening their credit profile, should be able to retain ratings above the U.S. <br />sovereign rating if we would otherwise assign ratings above the U.S. sovereign rating based on our view of other <br />rating factors. However, in light of the potential for common economic and credit environments between the U.S. <br />and state and local governments, we expect that in most instances in which state and local governments have ratings <br />above-that of the U.S., the differential will be limited to one notch <br />. It is possible for state and local governments to have higher ratings than the U.S. sovereign rating, most likely by no more than <br />one notch. <br />We derive our credit ratings by evaluating a borrower's individual credit factors based on our credit rating criteria. <br />. A factor in rating a state or local government above the U.S. is whether it is insulated from negative federal intervention in fiscal <br />management. <br />Our credit rating criteria allow for a higher rating on a state or local government than on the sovereign if, in our <br />view, the state or local government demonstrates the following characteristics: <br />• The ability to maintain stronger credit characteristics than the sovereign in a stress scenario, <br />• An institutional framework that is predictable and that is likely to limit the risk of negative sovereign <br />intervention, and <br />The projected ability to mitigate negative sovereign intervention by a high degree of financial flexibility and <br />independent treasury management. <br />Pursuant to our criteria, the fiscal autonomy, political independence, and generally strong credit cultures of U.S state <br />and local governments can support ratings above that of the U.S. sovereign. <br />Standard & Poor's ~ RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal ~ August 8, 201.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.