Browse
Search
2003 NS Purchasing - Innovative Design for Wastewater Treatment Design Services at NHSC and Feasibility Analysis of Sustainable Design Elements
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003 NS Purchasing - Innovative Design for Wastewater Treatment Design Services at NHSC and Feasibility Analysis of Sustainable Design Elements
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2011 2:00:16 PM
Creation date
8/17/2011 2:00:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/9/2011
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Contract
Agenda Item
8g
Document Relationships
Agenda - 12-09-2003-8g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 12-09-2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />° five Desi n <br />Innova <br />J <br />850 W. Morgan Street Raleigh, NC 27603 919-832-6303 Fax 919-832-3339 <br />Apri127, 2003 <br />Pamela Jones <br />Director of Purchasing and Central Services <br />Orange County <br />132 E. King Street <br />Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br />Ms. Jones: <br />I look forward to the opportunity to work with Orange County on such a challenging and <br />exciting project. The sustainable goals put forth by your commissioners for the old Cedar <br />Grove School are wonderful. I would be very proud to be a part of making them come <br />true. I thank you for the opportunity. <br />The following presents a proposed list of optional strategies which Harshad Padia (with <br />Padia Consulting) and I feel are opportunities which should be analyzed. Depending <br />upon your budget for this initial work, you could decide upon the level of effort desired. <br />In our very tentative review, we have also tried to place these option in order, in terms of <br />relative potential benefit (both energy dollar savings and environmental impact}. We <br />have also identified a fee associated with each item that would allow us to analyze the <br />particular item in relationship to the overall project. <br />To complete the following work, we will, from an energy perspective, require that the <br />current building be inputted into a total building energy simulation program. To <br />accomplish this analysis, we use the best program available -DOE II. To additionally <br />simulate any of the daylighting options, we use a program called DAYLITE which allows <br />us to simulate the daylighting contribution at numerous points within each individual <br />room, all day long, 365 days a year. "to determine the actual projected lighting and <br />cooling savings, this DAYLITE program output is, in turn, input into DOE II, which <br />accounts for the savings occurring from the particular daylighting option inxelationship <br />to the other building dynamics. To calculate the rainwater savings, we will utilize a <br />program developed by Innovative Design, specifically designed for optimizing the size <br />and design of rainwater catchment systems. <br />The proposed analysis will determine, for each measure, the energy savings (in dollars as <br />well as btus), CO2 savings, and nitrogen savings. This will be compared to the projected <br />cost of each measure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.