Orange County NC Website
that their road is not paved at this time and it would cause great concern to access a commercial or <br />large residential area. He said that this type of road would degrade the nature of the subdivision. <br />Phil Shloss lives in Becketts Ridge and objects to the building of townhouses directly <br />behind his property. He said that what was once a subdivision and infrastructure will now be used as <br />office space. He feels that area 2 is an area that people are looking at developing right now. He said <br />that there were a lot of people from Becketts Ridge at the meeting that had already left, and he hopes <br />that there will be another opportunity for them to speak. <br />Pete Langon lives in Wildwood, which is above Becketts Ridge. He mentioned that it <br />looks like a road will be needed from Old NC 86 to New NC 86. He suggested planning a road below <br />the school so that the private homes will not be disturbed. <br />Iris Simon lives in Becketts Ridge and said that he is opposed to the expansion of a <br />business district behind their Names. If it does proceed, he would like to see at least a 200-foot <br />wooded buffer behind the Names in Becketts Ridge. <br />Don Charland, a resident of Becketts Ridge, said that he was concerned because <br />when he bought this property he understood that it was residential. He said that there are a lot of <br />children in the area and with increased traffic there would be an increase in the danger for children. <br />Also, noise would be an issue. He is opposed to the rezoning. <br />Jeff Hillsburg, a resident of Becketts Ridge, is opposed to this plan. He feels that <br />there would be increased traffic with the thoroughfare between Old and New NC 86. Also, he does <br />not want light industry in his back yard. <br />Area 3a <br />Lawson Brown spoke on behalf of Chandler Concrete Company. He supports <br />excluding Chandler Concrete from the rezoning. He said that the Planning Board recommended, with <br />a vote of 7-2, that Chandler be deleted from the rezoning of area 3a. He spoke about the reasons for <br />excluding Chandler Concrete -general land planning principles, peculiar character of this property, <br />historical use of this property, present zoning of the property, special use permit that is on the <br />particular property, extensive regulation of the existing use of the concrete facility by the state and <br />federal governments, and the fact that Chandler has been a stellar corporate citizen. He said that <br />basically, the Chandler property was the tail of the property, and across the street is a commercial use <br />and a trailer park on the north, which were originally included in 3a but have since been excluded. He <br />feels that the goals of economic development could be accomplished by the exclusion of Chandler <br />without wrecking any plans. <br />At this time, it was about 10:30 p.m. and the Board decided to hear the remainder of <br />the citizen comments. <br />Commissioner Jacobs pointed out that there was a moratorium deadline and another <br />meeting should be rescheduled quickly because this still has to ga to the Planning Board, back to the <br />County Commissioners, and be completed before April 18tH <br />Area 3b <br />Carl Merritt was representing Merritt Marine. His property is zoned commercial <br />industrial. He is not sure if he is against the rezoning or for it, but he thinks he is against it. He is <br />trying to gather information about the impacts this rezoning may have on his property. <br />Area A <br />Wayne Pollard lives adjacent to Stagecoach Run Subdivision and owns aaine-acre <br />tract. He said that it looks like he will be surrounded on three sides by office space and he would like <br />to see the boundary with him not included in it. He is actually not part of Stagecoach Run Subdivision <br />but has access to his property through the subdivision. He cannot subdivide his property because he <br />is not on astate-maintained road. He would like for his property to be included as an additional tract <br />in Area A. But if it is not going to be allowed for any residential or transition residential, then he has a <br />concern for his neighbors that would be brought closer to a commercial area. He submitted a letter to <br />the Commissioners requesting that his tract of land be considered as an addition to the EDD, with <br />