Browse
Search
Minutes - 02-20-2001
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Minutes - 02-20-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 5:29:15 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:52:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/20/2001
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 02-20-2001-10a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-5b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-5c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-5d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-5e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-8a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-8b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-8c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-9a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-9b
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-9c
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-9d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-9e
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
Agenda - 02-20-2001-9f
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2001\Agenda - 02-20-2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
any increase in the noise level. She said that the activities of the development have already resulted <br />in additional noise from I-40 because the trees that were removed were 80 feet tall. She asked about <br />the additional plantings and if they would replace the existing vegetation or be added and Mr. <br />Alexander said that there would be minor clearing for the planting of new trees. She asked what Dr. <br />Diehl was planning to do about erosion control. <br />Craig Benedict said that the erosion control devices that are in place underneath the <br />stream have been verified as acceptable. <br />Betsy Kraus asked what assurances there were that Dr. Diehl was operating in good faith <br />whereas earlier he was not operating in good faith. <br />Steve Herman said that he was not satisfied with what has been done here. He agrees <br />with everything that Betsy Kraus said. He feels that the additional conditions in the resolution are <br />trivial and do not address the real issues that were brought to the Commissioners' attention at the <br />October 3`d meeting. Most specifically, the neighbors are concerned about the plan to build a state <br />maintained standard road that will involve considerable cutting into the earth berm which is the main <br />protection of the neighborhood from the noise on I-40. He suggested that the road be built to class A <br />private road standards and not public state maintained road standards. He said that the neighbors do <br />not agree with the findings of the acoustical engineer because it is common sense that if trees are cut <br />down, the noise through the property will increase. Regarding the conservation easement, he said <br />that the stream should have a stream buffer of at least 100 feet plus an additional width that accounts <br />for slope. He made reference to the formula in the zoning ordinance. He said that the stream buffer <br />should be around 150 feet wide to adequately protect the stream according to existing standards. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Gordon to <br />postpone this item to the meeting on March 6t" and that the Planning Director respond to the <br />suggestion of having a Class A private road instead of a public road. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />cam. Orancle County Position on NACo Support of Oil and Gas Exploration in the Arctic <br />National 1Nildlife Refuge <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Barry Jacobs that the staff <br />draft a letter to Jane Hague of NACo, with a copy to Ronald Christensen (Chair, Public Lands <br />Steering Committee} apposing drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The letter will be faxed <br />on February 26t" to Jane Hague and Ronald Christensen and a cover letter will be faxed to Peg <br />Reagan, Executive Director of the Conservation Leaders Network. <br />Commissioner Jacobs would like to be sure that the letter includes some expression of <br />support for the alternative of energy conservation and investment in alternative energy sources. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />10. REPORTS <br />a. Efland Sewer Extension Policy <br />The Board was to receive a report on issues surrounding policies regarding extensions of <br />the Efland sewer system. However, this item was postponed to a future meeting. <br />11. APPOINTMENTS -NONE <br />12. MINUTES -NONE <br />13. CLOSED SESSION <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Carey to go into <br />closed session "To consult with an attorney retained by the Board in order to preserve the attorney- <br />client privilege between the attorney and the Board," NCGS § 143-318.11 (a}(3} and "to consult with <br />an attorney employed by the Board in order to preserve the attorney-client privilege between the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.