Browse
Search
ORD-2003-146 Subdivision Regulations Amendment: IV-B-3 Street
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2003
>
ORD-2003-146 Subdivision Regulations Amendment: IV-B-3 Street
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 12:37:58 PM
Creation date
8/12/2011 4:48:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/24/2003
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C.4.a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_7 <br />Commissioner Gordon said that on page 104, she was asking what the standards of evaluation <br />meant. She said that she asked Craig Benedict what sections it applied to, so it is just a matter of <br />clarification. <br />Craig Benedict said that they can re -word this by saying where a conflict "exists, the most <br />restrictive standards will apply. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about page 105, regarding Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment <br />Method, and said that she understands that this is for all schools and not just public schools. She <br />thought that public water and sewer were preferred'. If it is not public water and sewer, then she <br />thinks there should be a water resources report. She asked about a solid waste convenience <br />center and if this was supposed to be provided. <br />Commissioner Gordon referred to page 108 and public road access. She said that public road` <br />access is required, but this does not state that it is. She thinks this should be stated. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to the growth management standards and how they apply <br />to schools and asked about a pedestrian bicycle plan and open space connectivity. She asked' if <br />you needed constructed resources. Craig Benedict will investigate these areas and provide a <br />report to the Planning Board. <br />Crauford Goodwin asked about historical resources. Craig Benedict said that they can look at this.. <br />No public comment. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to <br />accept the Administration's recommendation to refer the proposed amendments to the <br />Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the'BOCC` no sooner than January <br />26, 2004. <br />VOTE': UNANIMOUS` <br />13 <br />Craig Benedict made reference to the gray handout. There are some minor changes in this. They <br />went through a process of 18 months of moratorium for towers and they have reviewed four class <br />B telecommunication tower permits that went through the Board of Adjustment process. They <br />have learned' that there is more information to help them review the applications. The suggestions <br />are in the amendments. He explained the amendments. Some additional information includes <br />having photographs when they come in with the application, requiring a lump sum with the formal' <br />application, etc. There has not been consensus on the issue of the Master Telecommunications <br />Plan regarding the public safety system and how it works with the regulations. They have removed` <br />the County owned properties from the priority list at this time. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to page 12 of the handout where it says, "Co- locators shall <br />be refused access for co- location by charging exorbitant lease fees. He suggested adding to this, <br />"as determined by the County's consultant" since this is open to interpretation. <br />Sean Borhanian said that this was indicated in number five. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.