Browse
Search
ORD-2003-144 Grpwth Management System Lot Tresholds Zoning Ord
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2003
>
ORD-2003-144 Grpwth Management System Lot Tresholds Zoning Ord
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 12:38:52 PM
Creation date
8/12/2011 4:16:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/24/2003
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C.2.b
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b. <br />Craig Benedict said that this is in regards to the growth management system lot thresholds. At the <br />August public hearing, amendments were brought forward that classified certain areas as rural <br />shown as green on the map and certain areas as urban designated. At that time, the public <br />hearing announcement said that 41 lots + in a rural area would undergo a rezoning. The Planning <br />Board thought that a 20 +lot provision was more in order to represent the impacts that could occur <br />in a rural area. At the November5th meeting, the Board of County Commissioners went with the <br />Administration's recommendation, which was 41+ lots with the rezoning because that is what the <br />legal advertisement said'. The Board requested that 21 +:lots be considered at this public hearing. <br />There are no changes to thresholds in the urban designated areas. <br />He spoke about impacts of different subdivisions. The assumption for a rural road is that the <br />average high speed is 70 miles per hour. The intent of the enhanced rural preservation and <br />accommodating the agricultural community in these areas is to have a level of service on rural <br />roads that is more accommodating for the agricultural traffic. The level of service B has been used <br />in this analysis, and it shows that a 20-lot subdivision would create a 5% increase on the maximum <br />capacity.. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to <br />accept the Administration's recommendation to refer the proposed amendments to the <br />Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to the BOCC no later than December <br />9, 2003. <br />VOTE`: UNANIMOUS <br />3. Text Amendments to the Orange County Zoning Ordinance <br />a, <br />Craig Benedict said that this is also a follow up to the August public hearing and a discussion <br />concerning the permitted use table and special uses to regulate schools in different sections of the <br />County. Previously, there have been regulations for schools to be located in an economic <br />development district. It was suggested that a class special use process be brought back for <br />everywhere a school is located (residential or EDD). <br />This item has two parts. One is to make anywhere where schools are allowed now to have a class <br />A special use process. This allows more input by the Planning Board and the Board of County <br />Commissioners. In addition, there are other recently adopted special use standards that were very <br />comprehensive. He made reference to the "pyramid" on the handout and explained it. <br />He said that they have imported the regulations for subdivisions and have transferred them over <br />for the use of schools. They have created a new district. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.