Browse
Search
ORD-2003-141 Growth Management System - Amendments to Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances (2)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2003
>
ORD-2003-141 Growth Management System - Amendments to Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2011 10:37:53 AM
Creation date
8/12/2011 10:37:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/2003
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
9b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-05-2003-9b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 11-05-2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a. The use of the attached Growth Management System Map (Option 1 presented at <br />the; August 25~' Joint Public Hearing) for designating "Urbane and Rural Designated" areas;- and <br />b. In the Rural Designation. area, a Planned Development zoning amendment <br />requirement for all subdivisions containing greater than 40 lots.. <br />DOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />c. Legal Advertisement for November 24. 2003 Quarterly Public Hearing <br />The Board considered authorization to submit the Quarterly Public Hearing Legal <br />Advertisement for publication for the November 24, 2003 quarterly public hearing. <br />Craig Benedict reviewed the items for the advertisement as outlined in the-agenda <br />abstract. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the State Em'ployees' Credo"Union and whether <br />they are going to preserve the trees located-there. She also,asked. about the text amendments <br />and whatthings are going to go in he Class A. designation:.. <br />Craig Benedict said that the standards for schools were discussed briefly at the <br />August 25~' public hearing and the Planning Department is making some final revisions on those <br />special use standards that are uni ue to schools. These standards are expected to come back <br />on ahe next agenda (November 18~'~ or in early December. He said that these standards would <br />apply to other zoning districts besfdes just the EDD district for which they.. have a Class A <br />designation now. As discussed at the public hearing..,. these standards look good and that <br />wherever schools are built,.we should use these standards. <br />Commissioner Gordon' asked if these needed to: go backto a public hearing:.. <br />Craig Benedict saitl that-the standards have been discussed and he .believes they <br />can be a part of the County's adoption process without having to go back`to a public hearing. <br />He said that the only thing that they will haveto take backto a public hearing is if we want to <br />apply those upcoming standards to other districts, and'that is what this public hearing will be <br />about. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked aboua smart growth standards.. Craig Benedict said <br />that smart growth standards would not be a part of their special use standards, but that they <br />would be a part of a policy document that has to do with school capital funding. He said that. <br />they have the policy. and they think some of the smart growth passages are more of a capital <br />funding issue rather than. a regulatory special use standard. He said that growth management <br />could be:ncorporated in the policy, such as ideas about providing environmental lands within: <br />the property, Craig Benedict said that the would check with the county attorney regarding the <br />Hoed to go back to publichearing again,. but feels that it will not be necessary. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he. would be comfortable with he Planning' <br />Department and- the County Attorney getting together and deciding whether there needs to be <br />further recommendations that would need another public hearing item at our February quarterly <br />public hearing. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked about the credit union and if the EDD standards (such <br />as the no drive-thrus) that were worked on with the Town of Hillsborough'wauld apply in the <br />area of expansion for the State Employees Credit Union. <br />Craig Benedict said yes and that the Credit Union wants to shift some of their <br />existing facilities, enlarge the.. existing buildings, create. a remote drive-thru teller station, and <br />add a fifth lane (approximately 50°~6 of the amount of drive-thru over what currently exists),, <br />Commissioner Jacobs commented about the changes in the telecommunications <br />towers ordinance which he -has heard has been helpful to the Board of Adjustment.: in that hey° <br />have been able: to do-come closer detail work and to have a better. understanding of what the <br />possibilities are. <br />Craig Benedict. stated that a report about what has occurred and a :generic briefing <br />on what the Class A process will be fortowers would be available-aometime in 2004. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.