Browse
Search
Minutes - 12-06-2000
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Minutes - 12-06-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 5:34:12 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:51:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/6/2000
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
forum. He thinks that Orange County has a case that is far more solid and well grounded than any <br />previous case. <br />There were several questions about the vulnerability of the Harris plant from natural <br />disasters, particularly any kind of explosion or terrorist attack, extreme weather conditions, <br />etc. <br />Dr. Thompson said that the vulnerability to sabotage and terrorism is very real. After a lot of <br />protests, the NRC required its reactor licensees to have vehicle barriers in place to keep suspect <br />vehicles at a greater distance. There are extensive security provisions on the site. He said that <br />there were numerous cases where an inside person could cause a reactor accident, acting alone. <br />Regarding natural disasters, the Harris plant is pretty well protected against tornadoes and <br />hurricanes because of the heavy concrete construction. Off-site power would be the most <br />vulnerable feature of the plant. <br />Do you think that there will be a national repository for nuclear waste at Yucca <br />Mountain or anywhere in the United States anytime soon? <br />Dr. Thompson said that the federal government has accepted responsibility far tang-term <br />storage and disposal of spent nuclear fuel. The utility companies have been paying the federal <br />government to provide this service. The government has failed to meet its deadline for doing so, <br />and there have been lawsuits that have obliged the government to pay back this money. The <br />government is proceeding with one possible repository site, Yucca Mountain in Nevada. The <br />licensing of this will require that the federal government, in the form of The Department of Energy, <br />to apply to itself in the farm of the NRC for a license to construct and operate the repository inside <br />this mountain. In addition, there is a plan to develop an interim storage facility nearby. This would <br />be a monitored retrievable storage facility, which would use dry storage technology and fuel would <br />be transported from around the country to this facility and placed underground in the mountain. <br />The technology for having surface storage at Yucca Mountain exists today. Whether or not it will <br />be implemented is purely a political question and not a technical one. Congress has, for several <br />years in succession, voted in favor of shipping fuel to this surface facility and it has been vetoed by <br />the President. He said that it was fairly clear under the Bush administration that there would be no <br />such veto and a surface storage facility would exist in Nevada, perhaps beginning to operate within <br />5-10 years. The underground repository has some technical issues. By law, there has to be a <br />licensing process and the public in Nevada can intervene. <br />Can you comment on the legal requirements for CP&L to ensure itself against a <br />potential accident with the spent fuel or any other potential large release? <br />Dr. Thompson passed an this question. <br />There were several questions about Dr. Thompson's original comments on the <br />probability of an accident. <br />Dr. Thompson said that the minimum probability number that he came up with, 1.6 by 10 to <br />the -5, is based on previously conducted studies by the NRC staff and by CP&L. This number is <br />1.6 in 100,000 reactor years, which over a 30-year period is a one in 2000 probability of a pool fire. <br />With 100 plants around the country, that is a one in 20 chance of a pool fire over a 30-year period. <br />(Someone from the audience asked a question, but it did not pick upon the tape.) <br />Dr. Thompson said that a decision on what matters and what does not is not a technical <br />question. He said that his job was not to decide whether it matters ar nat. He said that he <br />extrapolated the numbers nationwide because pool fires in other states could affect North Carolina <br />significantly. <br />Of the 100 plants in the United States over the last 20 years, how many have been <br />involved in accidents? <br />Dr. Thompson said that the United States has accumulated approximately 2000 reactor years <br />in the history of commercial nuclear power. In that time, there has been one care melt accident in <br />1979. Worldwide, there have been 7,000 reactor years and there have been two core melt <br />accidents, one in 1979 and one in 1986. There has never been a pool fire. <br />How long must spent fuel stay in pools before it can be transferred to dry cask? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.