Browse
Search
ORD-2003-116 Amendments to Open Space Standards for Flexible Development Subdivisions
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2003
>
ORD-2003-116 Amendments to Open Space Standards for Flexible Development Subdivisions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 12:43:55 PM
Creation date
8/9/2011 11:32:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2003
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-16-2003-9c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 09-16-2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
29 <br />comments on transferring the $12.8 million from Elementary School #10 to High School <br />#3. He said that the County staff looks at it as <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs, seconded by Commissioner Halkiotis <br />to refer the proposed amendments to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be <br />returned to the BOCC no sooner than August 19, 2003. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />2. Orange County Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments <br />a. Amend Sections II, IV and other related sections to define and <br />regulate the open burning of trees, limbs, stumps and <br />construction debris associated with the development of <br />subdivisions. <br />This item was addressed above. <br />b. Amend Section IV -B -10. Flexible Development — Section C, <br />Open Space Standards to require that at least 75% of <br />residential lots in a proposed development be contiguous on <br />one or more sides to the system of open space. <br />Craig Benedict said that this is a requested amendment to the subdivision requirements <br />related to flexible development. Presently, the requirement for open space is 33% if the <br />flexible development option is used. The proposed amendment is an effort to explain more <br />about the functionality of the open space and the characteristics of it. He gave some <br />examples of subdivisions in the County and the configuration of the open space. The <br />intention is not to reduce the amount of lots, but to increase the accessibility of the open <br />space. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the 50 -foot easement. Craig Benedict said that this <br />would just be open space and a 50 -foot corridor would make the open space accessible <br />and would not encroach upon the adjacent properties. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked how big the path would be. Craig Benedict said that this is <br />not a requirement for a path to be put in. Commissioner Gordon pointed out that the <br />language says "pedestrian access paths ". Craig Benedict said that this language could be <br />changed. The subdivision applicant will decide, with direction, what the 50 -foot area should <br />look like. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked about the side yard setbacks and Craig Benedict said 20 feet. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that this is an improvement to the open space provisions. He <br />suggested on page 11 — C2 — Open Space Functionality, "maintenance of wildlife habitat." <br />He also suggested putting some of the language in more understandable terms for the <br />public. <br />Hunter Schofield said that some high - density developments such as affordable housing <br />might come into conflict with these amendments. He said that we might need to look at <br />how we use our open space standards to help or hinder some other County priorities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.