Orange County NC Website
ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: September 16, 2003 <br />Action Agenda <br />Item No. <br />SUBJECT: Amendments to Open Space Standards for Flexible Development Subdivisions <br />DEPARTMENT: Planning and Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y /N) 0 <br />ATTACHMENTS: INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />Proposed Amendments to the Orange County Craig Benedict, Director, ext. 2592 <br />Subdivision Regulations Robert P. Davis, Planner III, ext 2580 <br />Proposed Amendments as Submitted at Public Hearing TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br />Flexible Development Open Space Amendment Hillsborough 732 -8181 <br />Questions and Answers from Public Hearing Chapel Hill 968 -4501 <br />Minutes from May 27, 2003 Public. Hearing Durham 688 -7331 <br />Minutes from August 6, 2003 Planning Board Mebane (336)227 -2031 <br />Meetina <br />PURPOSE: To close public hearing and consider proposed amendments to the Open Space <br />Standards in subdivisions following the Flexible Development option. <br />BACKGROUND: Flexible Development, Section IV -B -10 of the Subdivision Regulations, was <br />adopted on July 1, 1996. Section C of the regulations. requires that Flexible Subdivisions set aside <br />a minimum of 33% of the total project acreage as protected open space. The current open space <br />regulations set forth the required compositional elements for both Primary and Secondary <br />Conservation Areas and, to a lesser degree, guidelines relating to open space shape.design. <br />The intent of the proposed amendments is to improve the layout of open space by making it more <br />accessible to the public and property owners for vistas or use. This is in response to concerns that <br />some of the more recent subdivision proposals lacked in the goal of preserving the County's rural <br />character and, in appropriate cases, accessibility. These amendments address the primary <br />negative design criteria in the current regulations, that being the creation of large blocks of more <br />urban - style lots unbroken by natural areas and lacking open space connectivity. <br />These amendments were presented at the May 27, 2003 Public Hearing and comments were <br />received from the Board of County Commissioners and Planning Board members. The following <br />changes were made in the ordinance amendment text in response to those comments. <br />Public Hearing Amendments <br />1. The classification of 'Pedestrian Access Paths' in Section C.3.c 'Secondary Conservation <br />Areas' has been changed in name to `Pedestrian Open Space Area' (POSA). It has been <br />explicitly stated in the text that this designation does not require the construction of an <br />improved path, but must only be: a) 50 -feet wide; b) in common ownership; c) undeveloped <br />except for recreational amenities, and d) reasonably traversable by foot. The determination <br />of when pedestrian improvements should be required in a POSA will be determined on a <br />case -by -case analysis of the overall open space goals of the proposed subdivision taking the <br />Planning Board recommendation into consideration. <br />