Browse
Search
Minutes - 11-27-2000
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Minutes - 11-27-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 5:35:52 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:50:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/27/2000
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 11-27-2000-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 11-27-2000
Agenda - 11-27-2000-2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 11-27-2000
Agenda - 11-27-2000-3
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 11-27-2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
covered loads. He made reference to the conditions about the road - 45, 46, 5Q, 51, 52, and 54 - <br />and the letter from Kimley-Horn saying that bike lanes should not be put in. He is not satisfied with <br />leaving this with NCDOT. He asked that the County consider working with other traffic engineers in <br />getting a comprehensive analysis. He does not think that NCDOT is very interested in traffic- <br />calming devices, but Orange County is. He would like the staff to work on the mitigation fund that <br />OWASA may pay into if a certain well repair is necessary. He would like the staff to work an the <br />possibility of requiring that fund annually, regardless, which would be administered by the County <br />far mitigation purposes for the quarry operation and that OWASA would contribute to in the same <br />way that it contributes payment in lieu for fire services around the Cane Creek reservoir. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis made reference to condition #8 and said that he would like <br />information on how much of the area was affected by the 5Q-foot buffer. Regarding condition #18, <br />"American Stone Company shall attempt to notify by telephone," he said that this language was <br />loose. Regarding condition #21, he asked if a 2Q-foot high berm was high enough. Regarding <br />condition #23, with respect to the concerns of Carrboro, he would like to know how the staff came <br />up with seven years versus three. He would rather it be three years. He suspects that it is a <br />political issue. Regarding condition #28, he said that he, Commissioner Jacobs, and <br />Commissioner Brown visited the quarry several months ago and he said that 9$°~ of the trucks <br />going in to get rock have the necessary equipment to cover the loads but the drivers da not take <br />the time to flip the lever. He said that covered loads should be required. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to page 33, #4 and the joint planning area <br />land use plan that has been amended to expand the area designated for extractive use to include <br />certain parcels, which were purchased by OWASA on September 7, 2000. She asked if this made <br />any difference to the environmental impact. Craig Benedict pointed out the areas that OWASA had <br />recently acquired. He said that it did not make any difference with the environmental impact <br />statement. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to condition #49, the biological assessment. <br />He asked who would pay for the consultant and what the purpose was of the survey. The <br />applicant will answer this question. <br />Chair Carey made reference to condition #15 and asked if the problems were going <br />to manifest themselves at the same time the mining ends. He asked if there should be an <br />opportunity for the residents to submit claims after the mining ends in 2Q30. He said that the timing <br />of the return of anything remaining in the fund should be reworked. <br />Applicant Comments <br />Peter Gordon, Chairman of the Board of Directors of OWASA, spoke about <br />OWASA's support of the quarry expansion. Far OWASA, the major issue is the water needs. <br />They have done a very extensive analysis of the projected water needs for their customers and <br />believe that their existing sources will take them through the year 2030, but at that point, they will <br />need an additional source of water. OWASA believes that using an expanded stone quarry to <br />capture the excess water from Cane Creek and University Lake is the best way to supply the <br />additional water needed. The bottom line for OWASA is water needs and water quality. He said <br />that OWASA has been part of the attempt to address ways in which the project can go forward in a <br />way that is the least disruptive possible to the surrounding community and most beneficial to the <br />surrounding area. He said that OWASA has now completed a comprehensive assessment of the <br />farmer Nello Teer asphalt plant, where there is some groundwater contamination from petroleum <br />hydrocarbons and trace amounts of chlorinated hydrocarbons. Reports on this assessment are <br />available. A detailed on-site inventory of the biological resources on the current site has also been <br />conducted. Also, OWASA has completed the purchase of the 1 QQ-acre plot from Mrs. Alice <br />Durham and is in the process of submitting to the County a draft conservation easement. This <br />means that when the mining is done, the land can never be used for anything but public water <br />supply and open space. In conclusion, he said that OWASA and various political bodies in Orange <br />County have worked hard on this project for many years because they believe that expanding the <br />stone quarry is the best thing to do for the overall community. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.