Browse
Search
Minutes - 10-02-2000
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Minutes - 10-02-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2008 2:06:29 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:49:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/2/2000
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 10-02-2000-1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 10-02-2000
Agenda - 10-02-2000-2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 10-02-2000
Agenda - 10-02-2000-3
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 10-02-2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
true Economic Development District. He said that it needs to be clearly stated that it was <br />clearly recognized back then. He said that there should be a looping system of the water lines. He <br />said that the expectation was that Mebane would bring water in from the west and this did not <br />happen. He has serious concerns about the proposed 200-unit subdivision (McGowan Creek) in <br />Efland and the proposed community well system. <br />Commissioner Brawn said that she remembers the Economic Development Director <br />describing the area that was to be included in a twenty-year plan. She thinks the Board should get <br />together with Orange-Alamance. She has concerns with permitting high-density development on <br />wells and using the County's sewer system. That is why she was concerned about making sure <br />that the transition area matched the sewer plan. She asked where this area was in terms of <br />development. <br />Craig Benedict said that the question was whether Orange County could provide sewer if <br />Orange-Alamance does not provide water. He said that designating Efland as a transition area <br />with the unknowns about the water system would be ill advised. What would be appropriate is if <br />the allocation that Orange-Alamance has from the Eno is used within this area. He pointed out <br />some subdivisions on a map that were yet to be developed {Richmond Hills - 42 lots, Ashwick - 60 <br />lots, High Rock Farm - 100 lots, Mill Creek I I - 70 lots, and others). He pointed out the subdivisions <br />on a map that have been approved over the last five years (approximately 400-500 units). He said <br />that there was a lot of other development occurring on the outskirts of Mebane that was putting a <br />lot of pressure on this whole area. The pressures and demand for housing in this area are <br />increasing at an accelerated rate. <br />Commissioner Brown verified with Craig Benedict that the possibility of siting a school in <br />Efland was problematic due to the water supply. <br />Commissioner Brown made reference to the comments made by the Planning Board <br />regarding the McGowan Creek subdivision and said that it was obvious that projects were coming <br />in far sewer but not far water. Craig Benedict said that this subdivision was tabled until the next <br />Planning Board meeting. <br />Scott Radway from the McGowan Creek subdivision said that at a meeting of the Orange- <br />Alamance Board of Directors, it was explained that the policy was that new development would be <br />required to bring its own water, which means that wells would have to be provided. <br />Commissioner Brown asked if OWASA gives people sewer if they are on wells, particularly <br />in large subdivisions. Commissioner Jacobs said that mostly OWASA did not provide sewer for <br />people that were on wells. <br />Geoffrey Gledhill said that there was a recent N. C. Court of Appeals decision, which <br />stopped towns from requiring public utility connections in the context of approving development. <br />There is same thinking that the same analysis might apply to requiring both water and sewer. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that it would be helpful to have a list of all subdivisions in the <br />County's jurisdiction that are on same kind of community well system. He thanked Commissioner <br />Gordon for leading the charge for proving that residential development does not pay for itself. <br />Discussion ensued about the cost of residential development. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked about the studies that are being offered as proof that this <br />area had enough water to support the development. She said that a lot of areas in the County had <br />fractured rock and it was difficult to know how much groundwater was available. Paul Thames said <br />that the only proof was to drill wells. He said that different areas produce different amounts of <br />water. <br />Commissioner Brawn asked Geoffrey Gledhill about the legal implications of connecting to <br />the sewer system and not the water system. Geoffrey Gledhill said that he will research this and <br />bring back to the Board additional information. He said that Orange County would not have to <br />make the sewer line available. <br />Commissioner Brown asked what would need to be in place to protect the citizens. Craig <br />Benedict said that it had to do with the density of development. He said that the staff was trying to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.