Browse
Search
ORD-2003-037 - Outdoor Lighting Standards Zoning Ordinance Amendment
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2003
>
ORD-2003-037 - Outdoor Lighting Standards Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 12:55:16 PM
Creation date
8/2/2011 12:00:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/26/2003
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
8n
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-26-2003-8n
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 06-26-2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OWQ- ac,©3 -CD31 <br />9� <br />c. Outdoor Lighting Standards <br />The Board considered closing the Public Hearing and making a decision regarding <br />the adoption of the Outdoor Lighting Standards amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. <br />Planning Director Craig Benedict said that this amendment would enable the County <br />to have standards for new development for lighting in the County. There were many comments <br />at the public hearing. There were three areas that were difficult to consider in the administration <br />recommendation. These areas had to do with requiring amortization for existing single - family <br />homes; holiday decorations (Planning Board recommends setting time limits on holiday lights); <br />and another amortization system for existing commercial, industrial, churches, and <br />governmental buildings. They propose not having it in the ordinance at this time, but just <br />beginning a public education campaign for residential and non - residential existing properties to <br />discuss the benefits of changing the lights out over a period of time. <br />Craig Benedict said that Duke Power requested that the County not prohibit mercury <br />vapor lights, but it is still recommended to be prohibited because it is the least energy - <br />conserving fixture. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked that governmental flags be defined. <br />Commissioner Jacobs referred to the issue that is addressed in 6.31.11 and said that <br />he thinks there should be some statement regarding unnecessary lighting that is not due to <br />security and that this should be discouraged. If the point is to bring attention to the building, it is <br />wasteful. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he understands not wanting to get into the single - <br />family retrofitting business, but he would still like to have a conversation with the power <br />companies where we do encourage the power companies to work with people to put in shielded <br />lighting. Craig Benedict said that they have pursued this and they are getting favorable <br />response from the power companies. <br />Commissioner Gordon made reference to page 7, applicability, and that item B says <br />that all outdoor lighting fixtures are to be amortized within 10 years. Craig Benedict said that <br />item B should have been pulled out. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked where subdivision signs were regulated in the <br />document. Craig Benedict pointed out page 9 under general standards. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he is concerned that it is not really addressed <br />specifically. Geof Gledhill said it could be a condition of approval to not permit lighted signs in <br />subdivisions as part of the subdivision review process. <br />Craig Benedict answered several clarifying questions. <br />In answer to a question from Chair Brown, Geof Gledhill said that new lighting <br />fixtures on existing homes after this ordinance is adopted would have to comply with these <br />requirements. <br />Commissioner Halkiotis asked who is going to police this and Geof Gledhill said that <br />it will be caught or not in the building permitting process. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that the staff should look this over again just to be sure <br />that nothing was left out or kept in that should have been left out. <br />The Board agreed to table this item to the next meeting as a consent item. <br />d. Aaaointments <br />(1) Adult Care Home Community Advisory Committee <br />The Board will consider the appointment of two (2) members to the Adult <br />Care Home Community Advisory Committee. <br />(2) Board of Health <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.