Browse
Search
Minutes - 06-07-2000
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Minutes - 06-07-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2008 2:06:07 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:48:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/7/2000
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 06-07-2000
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 06-07-2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recommended per pupil amount is $2,395. This number addresses three major areas -debt service, <br />teacher pay increases, and the increase in the number of new students. The Orange County school <br />system received 94.1 °l° of their requested amount, based an the Manager's recommendation. The <br />Chapel Hill-Carrboro school system received 96°~ of their requested amount, based on the Manager's <br />recommendation. The total recommended funding far education is 53.9 million dollars, and the <br />percentage of the general fund is 49.4%. He said that one of the points of decision and discussion on <br />the part of the County Commissioners is how much of the total general fund can go toward any one <br />function, including education. The Commissioners asked the Manager to pursue a target of 48.1 % of the <br />total general fund, but he felt that this could not be achieved based on the number of new students and <br />the expected increases in teacher pay, etc. He summarized the 'blue sheet' in the agenda packet far the <br />Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools current expense appropriation. <br />Commissioner Brown made reference to the per pupil allocation and said that the district <br />revenue far the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools generates $10,000,000, but that is not made part of <br />the per pupil amount. She asked why the $10,000,000 was not part of the per pupil number. John Link <br />said that the per pupil amount is the same for both school systems. When the district tax is addressed, <br />part of this amount is added to the per pupil amount allocated. <br />b. Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School Board Presentation <br />Elizabeth Carter, Chair of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City School Board, thanked the County <br />Commissioners for what they do for the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools. She said that the school <br />board, of course, is not satisfied with the allocation. She summarized the process they follow in <br />developing their budget. The school board reviews the requests that are received and cut wherever <br />possible. She asked the Commissioners to give some consideration to the original recommended budget <br />from the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools. She said that she personally supports the one cent for <br />affordable housing and also the needs of the senior citizens. She supports additional soccer fields and <br />realizes that there are other needs in the County. <br />Superintendent Neil Pedersen highlighted the system's record of achievement as listed in <br />the handout, including some national recognition for accomplishments. He summarized the reductions <br />that were made before the budget was presented to the Commissioners. The total reductions were <br />$714,726. He painted out that the total local budget for the school system was up 6.78% on aper-student <br />basis, and this is the lowest that it has been in the last four years. Related to the state mandate of <br />increased teacher salaries, he clarified why the school system said 8°~ and the Governor said 6.5°I°. He <br />said that 6.5% was the average increase that is projected by the state. He said that the increments were <br />larger in school districts that have younger, less experienced teacher populations. These schools districts <br />have been advised to budget more than the 6.5%. He summarized some of the specific items that were <br />in the requested budget such as compensation, teacher supplements, proficiency standards and minority <br />student achievement, technology, curriculum enhancement, etc. In regards to reductions and savings, he <br />said that they were being a little aggressive with charter schools in the sense that they are not providing <br />for any additional enrollment. They did appropriate $900,000 from their fund balance. He made <br />reference to the article that was distributed that was in the News and Observer about a teacher in <br />Chatham County and her financial struggles. <br />c. Board of County CommissionerslChapel Hill-Carrboro City School Board dialogue <br />Commissioner Halkiotis said that he is disappointed in County government and the <br />situation we find ourselves in. He said that we missed something about the State mandate of increased <br />teacher salaries. He noted that the Department of Public Instruction has been wrong in their predictions <br />of students. He said that he supports the one cent for affordable housing and he supports both the <br />budgets as presented by the two school systems. He would like to see how a webmaster could be shared <br />with the two school systems, County government, etc. He said that a webmaster would not be a full-time <br />job for just one agency. He made reference to charter schools and Neil Pedersen said that they were <br />paying for 117 students. He encourages joint cooperation with County government and other agencies. <br />Commissioner Brown supports cooperative and joint collaboration with positions that <br />could work for the County and the municipalities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.