Browse
Search
Minutes - 05-22-2000
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2000's
>
2000
>
Minutes - 05-22-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 3:54:49 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 1:47:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/22/2000
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-22-2000-
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2000\Agenda - 05-22-2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
decision making and public policy. He said that bringing in the public at an earlier time usually leads to <br />better understanding. He said that aver the next 12 to 18 months, there would be a lot of changes in the <br />comprehensive plan and he hoped that the public participation procedures would assist in making the <br />changes more understandable. <br />QUESTIONS FROM COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OR PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS <br />Commissioner Brown asked what the new procedures would eliminate from the present practice. <br />Craig Benedict said that instead of sending out 5,000 notices, the Planning Department would place ads <br />in a newspaper for four consecutive weeks. In addition, they would have an open house -meeting at a <br />residence or location in the specific area. These changes in notification would only be when the County <br />is changing major regulations. Anyone who petitions for a zoning change to make their property <br />commercial, or to build a tower, would have to follow the other guidelines and every person within that <br />500-foot boundary would have to be notified. <br />Commissioner Brawn asked if a public information meeting would be done each time. Planner <br />Robert Davis said that for a regular rezoning this procedure would not be followed. There would also be <br />signs posted around the property announcing the public hearing. Craig Benedict said that the Planning <br />staff could consider some sort of neighborhood meeting. <br />Commissioner Brown clarified that the neighborhood meeting could be added and Craig Benedict <br />said yes, this is a suggested change that the Planning Board will consider. <br />Commissioner Gordon feels that the education process is an improvement but she hesitates to <br />eliminate the letters and asked if the letters could be retained in the process. <br />Craig Benedict explained the reasons far not retaining the sending out of letters in the process. He <br />feels that it is a better investment in staff time to meet personally with people in the area where a change <br />has been requested. <br />Commissioner Gordon feels that it would help if people received a letter because some people do <br />not read the newspaper. Craig Benedict said that the staff would consider keeping the letters as <br />proposals are brought back. <br />Commissioner Jacobs said that he shares the concerns of Commissioner Gordon about eliminating <br />the letters. He made reference to the advertising and Craig Benedict clarified that it would be four weeks <br />in one newspaper of public record. He likes the idea of open houses and having the meetings in the <br />communities. He made reference to page five and questioned the posting of signs at least ten days <br />before the meeting and asked if people could be given additional time and if the signs could be pasted <br />more in advance. <br />Craig Benedict said that the signs could be pasted sooner than 10 days. <br />Commissioner Jacobs would like for the signs to be posted longer than ten days. He made <br />reference to page six and the advertising according to state statute and the rationale behind placing <br />larger advertising. The state statute is less than ~/ of a newspaper page in size. <br />Craig Benedict said that because Orange County sends out individual notices, that the ads have <br />been smaller in the past. He said that the staff is suggesting that the County put larger ads in the paper <br />than what is required by state law. He said that even though the larger ad is expensive, the increasing <br />amount of letters sent out is also expensive. <br />Commissioner Jacobs made reference to page eight and asked if this was the explanation or the <br />verbiage that would be included in the ordinance. He feels that 'adjacent' needs to be defined. He said <br />that he hopes this can be coordinated with developing a citizen's guide for dealing with the planning <br />process. He suggested that a subcommittee of the Planning Board might want to initiate this project. He <br />feels that citizens who have attended meetings to speak one way ar the other should be included an the <br />committee. He volunteered to serve on the committee along with Commissioner Brown. <br />Commissioner Brown asked about the follow up process after the neighborhood meetings. Craig <br />Benedict said that follow up would occur. From the neighborhood meetings a mailing list will be <br />developed and follow up notices will be sent for each step of the process. <br />There were no questions from Planning Board members. <br />John Link made reference to page 10 and compared the old with the new procedure and asked <br />about the BOCC work session. Craig Benedict said that each item would be presented at a work <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.