Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2003 - 8l
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 06-03-2003
>
Agenda - 06-03-2003 - 8l
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2013 3:17:24 PM
Creation date
7/14/2011 11:44:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2003
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8l
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br />C. Information /Issues at Planning Board Meeting on April 2, 2003 <br />1) Concern regarding the need for requests for extension of time limits to correct violations <br />to be in writing. <br />a. Language has been added to state that Staff shall provide assistance in cases where <br />an individual is not able to provide written request for time extension. <br />2) Concern about use of telephone in personal contact with offenders at initial notice of <br />violation stage. One Planning Board member expressed the opinion that a telephone <br />call may be perceived as a joke or should not be taken seriously. <br />a. The proposed Ordinance states that the telephone is one method that may be used <br />to make personal contact. In questionable circumstances (person not at home, <br />dangerous animal on loose on site, apparent dangerous situation), a telephone call <br />can be used to make initial contact. Staff recommends this option remain as part of <br />the proposed Ordinance. <br />3) Voted to keep civil penalty fine at $500 per day as originally proposed. <br />a. Staff, after concerns raised at the Joint Public Hearing on February 24, 2003, <br />proposed to leave the fine at $100 per day (Zoning) and to increase the fine from $50 <br />to $100 (Subdivision). Suggested language included addition of "up to (proposed <br />fine amount). Staff, in consultation with the County Attorney's Office, believes that <br />the language should not include the words "up to ", as this language is overly <br />discretionary and could lead to discrepancies in penalty assessments. A "flat <br />penalty" will result in simplified assessment calculation. <br />Process <br />1) Public Hearing held on February 24, 2003. <br />2) Ordinance Review Committee meeting held on April 2, 2003. <br />3) Planning Board meeting held on April 2, 2003. On April 2, 2003, the Planning Board, on a <br />unanimous vote, recommended that the BOCC adopt the proposed changes. <br />4) BOCC to make final decision. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: No public financial impact associated with this action. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): <br />Administration recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Ordinance with changes noted <br />above in A (1 through 7), B (1), and C (1 and 3), by the Planning Staff, Ordinance Review <br />Committee, and Planning Board. <br />Planning Board recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Ordinance with changes noted <br />above in A (1 through 7), B (1), and C (1 and 3), by the Ordinance Review Committee, and <br />Planning Board. <br />Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Ordinance with changes noted <br />above in A (1 through 7), B (1), and C (1 and 3), by the Planning Staff, Ordinance Review <br />Committee, and Planning Board. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.