Browse
Search
ORD-2003-032 Amendment to Open Space Standards for Flexible Development subdivisions
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2003
>
ORD-2003-032 Amendment to Open Space Standards for Flexible Development subdivisions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 12:59:33 PM
Creation date
7/13/2011 4:27:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/27/2003
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
C2b
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-27-2003-c1a2a3a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 05-27-2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
09-_8 <br />Unless accepted for dedication or otherwise agreed to by the county, another unit of local <br />government, the state or a private nonprofit land conservancy, the cost and responsibility <br />of maintaining open space and any facilities located thereon shall be borne by the <br />property owner and/or homeowner's association. <br />Section F EVALUATION CRITERIA <br />All site planning for open space should evidence a consideration of the specific <br />nature of the parcel being developed and a creativity in design which maximizes <br />aspects of functionality. At Bm any given site, the types of resources may vary widely <br />in importance ; (e.g., a natural area compared to a historic site) and Likewise, fiai� r each <br />type of resource may have areas of greater or lesser significance ;(e.g. a notable example <br />of local vernacular building traditions compared to a much altered older home). Priorities <br />for conserving such resources should therefore be based upon a thorough site analysis <br />and an understanding of what is more special, unique, noteworthy, environmentally <br />sensitive and/or historic as compared with other similar features of different types of <br />resources. <br />In evaluating the layout of lots and open space, the following criteria will be considered <br />as indicating design appropriate to the site's features and meeting the intent of the <br />Flexible Development standards. Whereas diversity and originality in lot layout are <br />encouraged, it is recognized that not all objectives may be achieved on a given site. Each <br />applicant must therefore achieve the best possible relationship between development and <br />preservation objectives. <br />F.1 General Criteria <br />The following criteria apply to all Flexible Development projects: <br />The shape and placement of the open space shall be reasonably contiguous, <br />coherently configured, and shall abut existing or potential open space on adjacent <br />properties, and shall be beneficial to stated functional open space goals. fig, <br />naffew a- <br />t be avoided a pt in the f trail stream a <br />landseape -1 er-s adjoining ,. rights of way and/or neighbor-heed �.,,,.d buff Open <br />lltl ivvauvvu <br />space should not be overly fragmented or in long narrow segments (except in the <br />case of pedestrian paths, stream or wildlife corridors, greenbelt paths or <br />landscape buffers adjoining street rights -of -way and/or neighborhood <br />boundaries). Electively sited individual open space areas (e.g. Secondary <br />Preservation Areas) should typically have agglomerated shapes. <br />Open space shall be connected, when applicable and reasonable, to other open <br />space in the same project and/or to existing or potential off -site open space or <br />pedestrian paths in land parcels adjacent to the Flexible Development area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.