Browse
Search
2003 S Solid Waste - Innovative Designs for Analysis of Septic System Options at the NHSC Cedar Grove
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Contracts and Agreements
>
General Contracts and Agreements
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003 S Solid Waste - Innovative Designs for Analysis of Septic System Options at the NHSC Cedar Grove
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2011 4:14:17 PM
Creation date
7/12/2011 4:14:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/6/2003
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Contract
Agenda Item
9b-1
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-06-2003 - 9-b-1
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2000's\2003\Agenda - 05-06-2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />ae65 ^ ^ <br />renovative esi n <br />850 W. Morgan Street Raleigh, NC 27603 919-832-6303 Fax 919-832-3339 <br />April 27, 2003 <br />Pamela Jones <br />Director of Purchasing and Central Services <br />Orange County <br />132 E. King Street <br />Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br />Ms. Jones: <br />I look forward to the opportunity to work with Orange County on such a challenging as <br />well as exciting project. The sustainable goals put forth by your commissioners, for the <br />old Cedar Grove School, are wonderful. I would be very proud to be a part of making <br />them come true. I thank you for the opportunity. <br />The following presents a proposed list of optional strategies which Harshad Padia (with <br />Padia Consulting) and myself feel are opportunities which should be analyzed. <br />Depending upon your budget for this initial work, you could decide upon the level of <br />effort desired. In our very tentative review, we have also tried to place these option in <br />order in terms of relative potential benefit (both energy dollar savings and environmental <br />impact). We have also identified a fee associated with each item that would allow us to <br />analyze the particular item in relationship to the overall project. <br />To complete the following work we will, from an energy perspective, require that the <br />current building be input into a total building energy simulation program. To accomplish <br />this analysis we use the best program available -DOE II. To additionally simulate any <br />of the daylighting options, we use a program called DAYLITE which allows us to <br />simulate the daylighting contribution at numerous points within each individual room, all <br />day long, 365 days a year. To determine the actual projected lighting and cooling <br />savings, this DAYLITE program output is, in turn, input into DOE II, which accounts for <br />the savings occurring from the particular daylighting option in relationship to the other <br />building dynamics. To calculate the rainwater savings we will utilize a program <br />developed by Innovative Design, specifically designed for optimizing the size and design <br />of rainwater catchment systems. <br />The proposed analysis will determine, for each measure, the energy savings (in dollazs as <br />well as btus), CO2 savings, and nitrogen savings. This will be compazed to the projected <br />cost of each measure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.